GOP Primary in South

@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
March 14, 2012 7:05am CST
Santorum proves that spending and the polls do not an election make. Side note: should Newt drop out?
3 people like this
7 responses
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
14 Mar 12
I'm sure glad to see Santorum doing so well. My first choice was Newt but that seems a bit far fetched now but I believe Newt should stay in as long as he can just to get some of the delegates from Romney. If Romney gets the GOP nomination we might as well prepare ourselves for another 4 years of obamanation.
1 person likes this
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
15 Mar 12
I just believe that we cannot continue to go with the candidate that is the "chosen" one by the party. It has happened several times in the past two decades including last election with McCain. McCain was the party pick and he got obliterated by Obama just as Dole got killed by Clinton as will, if nominated, Romney. Santorum has a much better chance to beat Obama on every level no matter what the polls say right now. Romney is so far from being conservative it is pathetic.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
15 Mar 12
It is pathetic. And yes, I think Obama's reelection campaign manager is helping the 'electibility' hype along. They want to hand pick who they run against for sure. During the healthcare 'summit' that Obama aired right after getting elected, when McCain tried to speak, Obama cut him off and said very hatefully, 'the election is over'. His attitude makes me sick. Why do I say this. I remember a day when the one who won treated his opponents with respect. But I'm old and that was YEARS ago. lol
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
15 Mar 12
So, you think a brokered convention would be alright?
1 person likes this
@burrito88 (2774)
• United States
14 Mar 12
Newt just seems like he's running on anger and won't quit. It's also probably his last shot at running.
1 person likes this
@burrito88 (2774)
• United States
15 Mar 12
That can be a bad thing in politics, especially on a world stage. Sometimes you need to compromise.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
15 Mar 12
I think Newt has shown some restraint during this campaign. But, yes it could be a bit of a bad thing on the world stage, but then, a whining whimpering apologist is also a bad thing on the world stage too, especially when it comes to dealing with bullies. I'm thinking of Newt more as a Reagan when he told Gorbachav to tear down the wall.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
15 Mar 12
He's got a right to be angry, doesn't he? But he is a bit of an egotist. But that's ok, he's got the brains to back it up. I have a brother who acts a lot like Newt. He used to say, I'm not conceited, I'm just convinced. He knew what he knew and he didn't have a lot of patience with people who didn't know.
1 person likes this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
14 Mar 12
I think the American people have spoken loud and clear - they want a Conservative to run. According to the results over 60% of the vote went to Conservatives. As to the Speaker dropping out I think he should but he should continue to speak out against the media and President Obama. He can be a force at the convention. Give the American people a clear choice between Gov Romney and Senator Santorum.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
15 Mar 12
I think you are right, but I would so love to see Gingrich wipe the floor with Obama in a debate.
1 person likes this
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
15 Mar 12
So would I, but Obama will never consent to those three-hour debates Newt would like to have with him.
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
14 Mar 12
I think it's amazing that Santorum has won so many states. It does take more than money to persuade people to vote, they have to believe in the candidate and be comfortable thinking of them as president. I admire his tenacity and also his willingness to talk about his morals and not avoid that issue. However, I think that if he is the nominee Mr. Obama will win the election. As for Newt, no matter how smart he is he won't win and I really think he should let the two frontrunners duke it out. He has so much personal baggage and there are so many negative stories both real and fictional about his life that he'll never be president. Even if it was proven that he could "fix" everything and drive out corruption, I doubt people would vote for him. What he needs is a professional PR firm to counteract the myths as well as the facts that the public has been fed.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
15 Mar 12
People are hungry for a man who will stand up for what he believes in. And they realize that if you are a moral man, most likely you will do as you say you will do. You won't lie, you won't cheat, you won't be bought. And Santorum has some good ideas on economic recovery.
1 person likes this
@kenzie45230 (3560)
• United States
15 Mar 12
Absolutely not. Santorum is not in a few states to come. Newt didn't do much campaigning in caucus states for a reason. In some, the delegates aren't even "hard" but rather "soft" meaning they can change. At least one state had a caucus and later has a primary. It would be great if all states were the same, but they're not.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
15 Mar 12
My state is one that has both, Santorum won the popular vote, Saturday is the caucus. We do need to make it more coordinated, but that would step on states rights. And we don't want to do THAT again, the last time it resulted in four years of war.
• United States
17 Mar 12
Rick Santorum makes me want to run into Mitt Romney's arms. I can't say that about a lot of people. If I were on your side, I would think Newt should drop out. He is both a historian and a previous politician. He should figure out he is diluting the vote.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
Why the intense dislike of Santorum?
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
lol, wow. He does not believe our REPUBLIC should be a theocracy. Do you even realize what that is? He is not anti anything. He is pro American. He believes that 9% of the people (gays) should not have special rights over and above what other Americans have. He believes in traditional marriage, which the majority of Americans do as well. I've heard him speak on this. He is not anti anyone. He wants to preserve traditonal marriage. He has spoken about his private beliefs about birth control, but he has said over and over that birth control is available now and should be available always for those who want to use it. The whole issue wasn't about that anyway. The White House attempted to make it about birth control, but it was about the government forcing the church to go against its teachings. The first ammendment to the Constitution, which is still the law of the land, states that Congress shall make NO LAW respecting the establishment of religion (choose one over the other)nor the free exercise thereof (make no law limiting the exercise of a persons beliefs). When obamacare was passed, this mandate (law forcing people to do something) was there in it. Its election year, Obama knows that the people, if they really understood what he was attempting here, would probably not support it. So he 'made' it about some manufactured 'war on women'. It is far from the truth and it upsets me that you actually believe it. I've listened to every debate, I've made myself aware of the candidates stand on the issues. NONE of them want to make America a theocracy. That is just ridiculous and it is what the progressive liberals try to scare the people with everytime a conservative runs for office.
• United States
15 Mar 12
Yes, I think Newt should drop out. I do not think Newt has a change againts Obama in this year election. I would think Ramney is more ellectable.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
15 Mar 12
Why?