Holder did his Homework
By debrakcarey
@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
April 5, 2012 12:06pm CST
FOX is just now reporting that Attorney Holder did his assignment and wrote his three page paper on the Power of the Supreme Court to strike down an unconstitutional law.
He said the president's remarks were consistent with his beliefs that the Court does have the power to over turn an unconstitutional law.
He said the Courts have the final say. It's now on record, he has to abide by their decision even if it doesn't go his way.
Let's talk about separation of powers as spelled out in the Constitution.
3 people like this
4 responses
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
5 Apr 12
Or played his cards a bit to early? I'm remimded of Kenny Rogers 'Gambler' song. lol
We know Obama does not believe in the separation of powers.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-flouting-article-2-section-2-constitution-i-refuse-take-no-answer
But his beleagured Attorney General who also has no regard for Congressional power over HIM had to sit in the corner and write what amounts to a concession paper to the Courts.
It gives me the tiniest bit of hope that we can take back our country from these oligarchs.
1 person likes this
@peavey (16936)
• United States
5 Apr 12
CNN put it: "The letter affirmed the government's stance that federal courts indeed have the authority to decide the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act -- and any other law Congress passes."
Maybe we should ask "which government?"
Yes, this is a little ray of hope that all is not lost. America has done it before.
Yes, this is a little ray of hope that all is not lost. America has done it before.1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
5 Apr 12
It also said the president hadn't said otherwise. Holder got his gold star for doing as he was told, but included a 'so there' aspect to it as well.
1 person likes this

@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
5 Apr 12
Yes, it's now on record. Although I thought that the appeals panel's request might have backfired on them and been a bad PR move that might garner more sympathy to the president's remarks, it seems to have forced the administration to admit that they cannot coerce or strong-arm.
One must admit that the Supreme Court's sworn duty to uphold the Constitution absolutely requires that their decisions be based on nothing less than the Constitution. Judicial review was established as their duty and right, solidified by Marbury v. Madison in 1803.
Of course, if a law is struck down as being unconstitutional, the legislature may craft and pass a new law. If the mandate is ruled unconstitutional, and because of that the entire health care law is vacated, then the legislature will have to write a new law that falls within their Constitutional authority. Perhaps they might even deign to read it before passing it, thus making it more likely that someone will notice the bits that won't pass muster in a Supreme Court review.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
5 Apr 12
You mean, actually do their JOB? How novel an idea.
sorry, I really must stop being sarcastic.
I am thinking perhaps Congress and the Supreme Court is a bit fed up with being marginalized by this narcissist president.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-flouting-article-2-section-2-constitution-i-refuse-take-no-answer
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
5 Apr 12
What this has accomplished in the long run, is begin a national discussion on just what the powers of each of the branches of our government are. That is a good thing in my mind.
Holder did defend his boss by saying the president's remarks were consistent with the Courts having this power.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
6 Apr 12
I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall, watching him steam over this.
1 person likes this
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
7 Apr 12
I'd personally like to have Holder write a three-page paper on what's Constitutional about enforcing voter intimidation laws only against certain races instead of to all equally.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
7 Apr 12
You hit the nail on the head bagarad. Still no word on The New Black Panther intimidation of the Zimmerman family is there?
It's a shame when you must walk through the gauntlet of radical intimidation to vote and the Attorney General won't stand up for you. That ought to worry even our most liberal folks here on myLot. I noticed that it was not something they were worried about when they expressed outrage about the whole Zimmerman/Martin case.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
7 Apr 12
Apparently they only worry about intimidation in the form of 'conservatives' speaking out against big government, we all 'know' how awful that is.






