Should People Get Involve With Political Disputes?

@artemeis (4189)
China
August 14, 2012 10:42am CST
Recently, I believe a lot of you would have read about the island disputes between my country and the latest, South Korea over Dokdo. I cannot help wondering why people would actually want to get involved with the disputes staging protest demonstrations and even crashing into the Chinese embassy when such actions could not help with anything, much more a settlement. Not only, does it not help but actually endanger their very personal well being. Shouldn't they let their government settle the dispute according to the international laws? Does it mean that they do not trust their country's leaders to handle the dispute? Or, they do not trust the established international laws? I really hope that they would stop whatever they are doing or planning to do before they get into further problems especially with the law.
4 responses
@lampar (7584)
• United States
21 Aug 12
Street protest over territory dispute between nation is actually exercise of one political rights in a free country, there is nothing wrong about that, as long as the protest is non-violent, many elected government in the free world will allow that to happen. I'm just wondering why both countries do not file for an international dispute resolution tribunal hearing in UN, or even to the international court of justice; there is always a channel for territorial dispute open in UN for member states, they need to get their act straight and move ahead with using diplomatic channel available to them before going for an all out war from verbally to physically fight between their soldiers. I am also against attacking a foreign embassy and the host goverment should provide protection against violent protestors per se. Usually attacking an embassy is a violation of internatioanl law; and treaty between countries. I hope the government will take this matter serriously whenever foreign embassy is under attack by their population.
1 person likes this
@artemeis (4189)
• China
21 Aug 12
I do not know if you are aware or not but the island disputes have already been filed with the international courts and have yet to reach a verdict. As you can see, the cases are actually pending on an outcome but surprisingly the demonstrating hot heads seems to be "unaware" of it. Like you, I am for the proper and non violent demonstrations but so far, we've seen the emotionally charged ones which ended up protestors getting into trouble with the law. I'd rather that people go on with their lives and let the law settle the disputes.
@artemeis (4189)
• China
1 Sep 12
Freedom of expression? I see your country is no different in trying to extradite Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, the take down on "Occupy Wall Street" and the precautionary stop on the release of the book "No Easy Day". FYI it was not just a demonstration in front of the Chinese embassy but a man charging into the Chinese embassy.
@lampar (7584)
• United States
26 Aug 12
By the way, territorial dispute is not a political dispute as you want to believe, if a 'bandit' regime like yours want to occupy South Korean's land, they have every rights to stage a protest in front of the Chinese embassy to be heard, it is within their rights to exercise part of their political freedom in a free country. There is nothing unusual about it except in the eye of the communists who will feel threaten by the freedom of expression of the common people.
• Philippines
17 Aug 12
I think that you should also consider the fact that many people are concerned when it comes to politics and specific to this case, sovereignty rights. If I am correct, your country and mine is also in a similar dispute. Some people feel that it is their right to protest the ownership of such islands as a show of force against the other party in violating their sovereignty or right of possession. This show of force means that they are not given their rights to the said island without a good reason or justification on both sides. As much as we wanted to leave the matter to the government, the representative government can also do many things, including what the public thinks is wrong. They might the leaders or representatives but when it comes to possession and territory, the whole nation involved. The government is still the representative of the people and makes the appropriate decision, which can either be met with approval or disapproval of the said public. In addition, the public can also show its disapproval of the government decision by holding such protests. It is the people’s right to be involved if they wish. The same applies to not beign involved.
1 person likes this
@artemeis (4189)
• China
18 Aug 12
Fair enough. It is the right of the people to be involved but I am sure it is not the right for people to break the law or disrupt the peace of the country like charging into foreign consular offices, turning a peaceful demonstration into a violent one. I have nothing against speaking up and out, however, I believe it will have to be one that is appropriate and law abiding. If the people thinks that their representative is wrong, then I am sure the established institutions involved would have proper channels for the people to seek out. Violence just has no solution to anything including this dispute.
• Philippines
15 Aug 12
Some people are natural-born leaders, and some people are just meddlers. Up to you to determine which is which, but both have a knack for going over the government's business. I also have a bunch of those here, in the Philippines, and to tell you the truth, I don't care. As far as I know, they tried acquiring some island here. As a citizen, I just leave it up to them. If we don't get it, fine. If we get it, "Hey! Philippines is expanding!" ..then move on with my life.
1 person likes this
@artemeis (4189)
• China
18 Aug 12
I am sure that you will agree with me that there is always a right way of doing things. One that advocates proper channels and non disruptive ways. Even protests can be conducted in a peaceful and legal manner but here we see protestors going head to head with the authorities and breaking the law. I just find this excessive and counter productive.
• India
14 Aug 12
Hi friend, some people are very much interested in politics and take part in such kind of disputes, but it is not a good thing and it will create a lot of unwanted things in life, this kind of people must avoid their activities and select the proper person as their representative
1 person likes this
@artemeis (4189)
• China
15 Aug 12
I have nothing against people who are interested in politics and even be outspoken in it. However, I feel that there should be self control and if there is a need to be active then do it properly like go through proper channels or if capability warrants go into government. Rather than, taking to the streets, disrupting the peace and commit a crime for it. At the end of the day, does not even contribute one minute effort towards solving the issue at hand.