Hypocritical laws
@OpinionatedLady (5965)
United States
September 18, 2012 10:56am CST
This is a discussion about the hypocrisy of these laws and not about whether they are good/ bad or moral the laws themselves. Please keep the political views about the laws themselves out of it and stay on topic of the hypocrisy.
Now that I said that here it is. I was watching the news and on it last night they had a story about a man going to jail because he had an accident with his car. Yes it was a DUI. He hit a woman and her daughter on their way to the doctor. The daughter was pregnant and lost the baby. He is going to jail on a lower murder charge for the baby's death. Now the thing it the woman told a local paper it was the best thing that could have happened as they were paid for wrongful death of the baby and saved the money from, now get this, her daughter who was being taken to the doctor to have an abortion! SO it would not have been murder for this girl to abort this child but it was murder because a drunk hit them and killed it.
So after looking into these laws what I am taking form this is that an unborn child of less then 24 weeks gestation, has protection on it's life from drunks but not it's mother. I mean it's only murder if someone wants the baby? Now legally if before 24 weeks the law considers for abortion the fetus to not be a person how can they say it is a person if it dies some other way and vice versa if it is a living being at that point how can it not be if the mother wants to be rid of it? Can it get any more hypocritical.
As for the story above I do not think someone who was on the way to abort their child should get wrongful death pay from the drunk. 
Now that I said that here it is. I was watching the news and on it last night they had a story about a man going to jail because he had an accident with his car. Yes it was a DUI. He hit a woman and her daughter on their way to the doctor. The daughter was pregnant and lost the baby. He is going to jail on a lower murder charge for the baby's death. Now the thing it the woman told a local paper it was the best thing that could have happened as they were paid for wrongful death of the baby and saved the money from, now get this, her daughter who was being taken to the doctor to have an abortion! SO it would not have been murder for this girl to abort this child but it was murder because a drunk hit them and killed it.
So after looking into these laws what I am taking form this is that an unborn child of less then 24 weeks gestation, has protection on it's life from drunks but not it's mother. I mean it's only murder if someone wants the baby? Now legally if before 24 weeks the law considers for abortion the fetus to not be a person how can they say it is a person if it dies some other way and vice versa if it is a living being at that point how can it not be if the mother wants to be rid of it? Can it get any more hypocritical.
As for the story above I do not think someone who was on the way to abort their child should get wrongful death pay from the drunk. 
2 people like this
6 responses
@laglen (19759)
• United States
20 Sep 12
The hypocrisy would be funny if not for such a sad situation. There are plenty of such laws. My all time favorite hypocrisy is Congress makes the laws but do not have to adhere to them. Did you know that if a Senator is drunk driving and pulled over by law enforcement, they can just say "I am a senator doing the states business" and law enforcement must let them go. 

@maximax8 (31042)
• United Kingdom
19 Sep 12
The law said murder a person and you will go to jail. The man had a car accident and hit the girl going to the doctors with her mom. The girl was able legally to have an abortion. The man had to go to jail because he killed the pregnant girls baby. Another law says a fetus of less than 24 weeks is not yet a person. How strange because life begins at conception. It should be murder if the girl wanted her baby. The laws do not go well together.
@ANTIQUELADY (36440)
• United States
18 Sep 12
I agree w/u. I do not believe in abortion.Bet that mama wishes she had kept her big mouth shut.
@OpinionatedLady (5965)
• United States
18 Sep 12
I doubt it no one has done anything to amend the situation, in fact it is the fact that the laws actually support this how they are written (though I am sure not meant for this situation) blanket style, that has been cause for argument.
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
18 Sep 12
I agree. We shouldn't have legalized murder. It's wrong to rightfully have a drunk charged with murder of a baby unborn, and then hypocritically legally allow the doctor to commit premeditated murder of that same baby.
This is wrong and hypocritical. We should completely ban baby murder. How our screwed up society ever legalized murder of a baby is beyond me.
@OpinionatedLady (5965)
• United States
18 Sep 12
Yes how is one worse then the other? Then again if premeditated murder is such a no no then how can an abortion be OK as you said.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
18 Sep 12
Murder is murder, at the hands of a drunk or at the hands of a doctor.
@OpinionatedLady (5965)
• United States
19 Sep 12
What do you think about the hypocrisy it's self though?





