Do any of you deal with NOT sharing the same stance on politics as your spouse..

@mommyboo (13174)
United States
October 16, 2012 7:59pm CST
...or significant other? It doesn't cause us any personal problems but we will never see eye to eye on it. I am definitely NOT anywhere near the republican side, which (to me) seems very anti-woman, anti-choice, anti-love, and anti-help-the-middle-class. Keep in mind that I am hardly a democrat either, but I DO tend toward policies which are not going to take any rights away from me as a typical citizen. I don't need any MORE red tape or jumping through hoops to accomplish things, it's a pain in the butt enough already. So... if you have differences of opinion in the political arena, do you just keep that separate and never discuss it? I have no desire to change my husband's mind but I am also never going to change mine.
2 people like this
7 responses
@dorannmwin (36392)
• United States
19 Oct 12
Well for us, I think that for the most part our stance on politics is pretty much the same. Now this isn't something that happened because of planning, it just turned out that soon after the two of us met we realized that we do agree with political issues. Our feeling is that there needs to be a third party that is successful that is more of a middle ground than either of the two parties right now are. So when it comes to this year's presidential election I don't know where he is going for sure and I don't even know where I am going for sure, but I definitely think that there needs to be change.
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
19 Oct 12
The libertarian candidate is probably closest to what might keep the country from going off a cliff, it's too bad he doesn't have enough support to get rid of the other two. I'd rather there was a middle ground too..... combine some of both platforms and make it work.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
20 Oct 12
You just expressed the reason we NEED a third party lol. People always argue over right and left, which is why the MIDDLE should always win. Extremes are usually not good and usually do not meet the needs of most people.
@dorannmwin (36392)
• United States
19 Oct 12
I think that the reason that he doesn't have the support that is necessary to win the election is because of the fact that having three major political parties has never been something that has been able to work in this country.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
17 Oct 12
We are very similar. The only difference I can think of off hand is foreign policy. He is a staunch Ron Paul supporter (I supported Paul as well) but the isolationist side I have a problem with. I agree with most, we should stop borrowing money to send to other countries but I do think we need to be the super power we have been. I am fr a VERY strong military.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
20 Oct 12
I agree we should not be the watch dog. But we should be a super power. This for our protection. The stronger you are the less likely you will be attacked.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
19 Oct 12
Why are we borrowing money from other countries to send to other countries again? Shouldn't that mean the country we send it to should just pay the country we borrowed it from back? Take us out of the equation after that, after all, we are doing it to help somebody, we shouldn't have to take on debt that's not even really ours. As far as the military, I think it's a mistake for the US to continue to be the world's watchdog. I'm not even sure why we went there in the first place... it's not our job to go to war for everybody and fight everybody and fix everybody. We can't even fix ourselves right now. IF we were able to focus on the people in our country and fix our internal issues FIRST, then I could see doing this, but we have all sorts of problems of our own, homelessness, unemployment, illiteracy, illegals, domestic violence, and issues with our educational system. I really don't see why we are focusing OUTSIDE of our country rather than focus on these immediate concerns WITHIN our country.
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
20 Oct 12
We will be stronger in a global sense if we take care of our own so we are INTERNALLY stronger. This only makes sense, as a strong integrated well trained, fed, and rested unit of soldiers who have the resources they need and trust each other will fare much better than say.... a rag tag untrained, tired, hungry, and arguing group of people who have no idea why they are together and don't like each other. If we take care of our country and those within it FIRST before we look outward again, we will remain a super power. If all we do is ignore our problems at home and focus our efforts outward, we're asking for trouble.
• United States
17 Oct 12
I am very political. My husband isn't. He says I am political enough for both of us. But he knows I am heavily involved in local and national politics. It makes me happy so he supports me. Most of the time he stays out if it or watches the kids so I can go to rallies or meetings. I respect that he doesn't care for politics. He respects that I do. Although he did go to one of the primary debates with me. But I think that was more to be there in case I needed bail or things go rough. My state is known for getting ugly and I usually support candidates that go against the status quo so sometimes he goes and acts as a body guard.
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
19 Oct 12
BAIL! Now that was something I didn't expect to see My husband is more political than me but he's more into reading, listening to, and ingesting information. I prefer to avoid all of it because I flat out do not like the PEOPLE. I don't mind that he likes it, but I DO mind when I have to be exposed to it via the tv or KFI, Fox News is the worst, and AM radio is probably second worst.
• Australia
17 Oct 12
In the same area but not exactly politics, I once left a woman because of a case of diametrically opposed belief. We had here the famous Lindy Chamberlain case, where the media had a feeding frenzy and most of Australia, including many supposedly reasoned public figures, got on board, and she was convicted of killing her mentally disabled child. She claimed the child was taken by a dingo at Ayers Rock tourist camp. I never did believe she was gulity, so when I was studying I took a Sociolgy minor and tackled a unit on the law, which led to doing a paper on the Chamberlain case. By this time she had been pardoned on the grounds that the original verdict was unsound. In the course of this paper I discovered: No Motive, No Weapon, No Witness, No Opportunity, No Confession, No Arterial Spray, No Scissor Cuts, No Foetal Blood in the Car, No Crime, and No Case. The forensic evidence was abysmally compromised, in fact what the scientists thought was infant blood was actually rustproofing. The local aboriginal trackers had, right from the start, told police, "The dingo took the child." The local park rangers had complained for years that the dingos were a major problem, and there had been several previous near misses. Only a matter of months later a child was taken by a dingo at a different tourist park, Frazer Island. Etc. She was clearly not guilty. My partner, on the other hand, had immediately jumped onto the bandwagon and pronounced her guilty. This was before we met, I might add. But even though Lindy had been cleared and released, and in the face of all the evidence I told her about, she still believed implicitly that Lindy was guilty. In the face of this inflexibility I found myself totally disillusioned with her, and called the relationship off. I can't imagine getting into a relationship with someone of diametrically opposed political, religious, or philosophical beliefs. These would appear very early in our discourse, me being the person I am, and I would walk away no matter how attracted I was. I don't believe one can build a lasting relationship where such differences exist. Lash
1 person likes this
• Australia
19 Oct 12
Oh yes, I talked myself blue in the face trying to show her. None of it made a blind bit of difference to her belief. Two things were raised by this: first, and most importantly, her inflexibility; and second, her overwhelmingly present habit of seeing the very worst possible side of everything. It was these diametrically opposed attitudes rather than the issue itself which led me to break it off, I simply can't live with inflexibility and half empty glasses. Lash
• United States
17 Oct 12
we agree on most stuff, and have learned in some areas that we have to cede the upper hand to one or the other. In the areas where we strongly disagree, we avoid the full out debates because they end up not being productive, but we kind of pick around the edges of them so over the years we have both come to an understanding of the others position.
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
19 Oct 12
That's one reason why I try to be indifferent about it. If some stance or a particular candidate or agenda or policy bugs me, believe me, I will give my two cents about it but it's not like I go picket or write letters or do anything. I just file it away and if it were ever to come up and cause problems for me, I would seek legal counsel and figure out what I could do to get around it. So far I have never had to do that, a lot of this stuff is hot air and doesn't really cause any personal issues within your day to day life.
@lelin1123 (15595)
• Puerto Rico
17 Oct 12
Thankfully I don't have that problem because my hubby and I are on the same team. We are Democrats who are for the people. People in my family or friends who support the other side I don't discuss these anything political with them because it would get too heated for me to deal with. I can't imagine living with someone who might differ on this subject. It just wouldn't work for me I believe.
@stary1 (6612)
• United States
17 Oct 12
lelin1123 LOL I can relate..I have relatives totally different in political beliefs..in fact one told me..just take whatever you believe and know I belive the opposite.. I avoid discussion because I only like to discuss politics with someone why doesn't get hysterical if someone disagrees.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
19 Oct 12
MANY of my friends and I differ nearly 180 on political leanings, but politics is not why I'm friends with anybody. In a global sense, there will never be a candidate who actually represents me anyway, unless I run for office and I would die first before I went THERE lol. Even funnier - I think my parents are more conservative too. The only issue I'm conservative about is fiscally - I think the government needs to stop spending taxpayer money, period. Also, no amnesty. Other than that, I support most other liberal policies including continued freedom of choice in most arenas.
@stary1 (6612)
• United States
17 Oct 12
mommyboo My hubby and I are both in the same party, but he is more extreme and I am more moderate. I don't understand how James Carville and Mary Matalin live together. He is sooooo far left and she is sooooo far right Still they seems very happy as a couple and as a family. I give them a lot of credit because I don't think I could live with someone so far extremem from me. I don't agree the GOP is anti-women..I think that is a talking point the left has put out and many bought into it.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
19 Oct 12
Well, anybody who wants to take away any of my rights is not okay and not right, regardless of what 'party' they claim to be. This is not 1950 and I have little interest in returning to any of those attitudes. I also believe in total equality of genders, no matter what. I am sick and tired of gender being used as a reason to accept double standards of any kind. When you have the stance of one party using MEN to try and remove choice about healthcare from women, that seems a bit anti-woman to me. Even my husband knows he doesn't get to TELL ME what I get to choose from, only I choose. I would hardly accept any discussion from other men on the planet when it comes to what I get to choose about MY body. I know that is just one aspect, but that's enough for me to veto most of the views of that side. If that were WOMEN putting it out there, maybe they could give some reason why they felt it was justified, but there is never any justification for a man to think he knows anything about being a woman.