Senator Reid won't work with Romney as President
By bobmnu
@bobmnu (8157)
United States
November 3, 2012 1:03am CST
Senator Reid has come out and accused Senator McConnell of not willing to work with the Democrats to get legislation passed. McConnell did come out and say that the top thing was to defeat President Obama after two years of his being president. Now before Gov Romney is elected Senator Reid has implied that the Democrats will not even give him a chance, but will refuse to work with him on legislation. President Obama has painted the Republicans as being the ones who will not pass anything yet the House has passed several bills and sent them to the Senate where Senator Reid has refused to let them come up for a vote. Who is the problem in the government?
1 person likes this
5 responses
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
4 Nov 12
Bob, how many of those bills republicans passed were partisan and including aspects that democrats wouldn't agree on? Then you have bills that house republicans change bills behind close doors and then LIE about it, what do you do?
When McConnell said he wouldn't work with Obama he was applauded by MANY on the right. Now that Reid has said that same you are mad? Were you mad at McConnell for not just saying this, but doing it?
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
4 Nov 12
So the bills were partisan, why didn't the Senate vote on them? They could have voted them down and then offered something else. Senator Reid didn't want to vote because some Democrats might have voted with the Republicans and passed the bill or it would have forced the Democrats to deal with things that they did not want to deal with like a budget. Some of the bills were what the new congress was elected to enact and the voters would not be happy if their Senator voted against it. How many budgets did the Senate vote on and send back to the House?
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
4 Nov 12
and the jobs bill you like to say the Republicans wouldn't pass contained piggy back legislation the Democrats wanted in it.
I see nothing wrong with the Republians trying to stop the socialism the liberals keep trying to foist on the American people. They're doing what they were elected to do, represent the wishes of their constituients. They're sent to Washington to be the VOICE OF THE PEOPLE, not to compromise with socialists.
@ladybugmagic (3978)
• United States
3 Nov 12
The GOP is the "PARTY OF NO". They even took a pledge to vote against anything that would help the country progress out of the hole they created so that Obama will look like he did a poor job. They have employed an unprecedented number of filibusters.
So.... Governor Romney would, indeed, destroy the US. I do believe filibustering goes both ways, now don't it?
When it happens to your side, it's not okay, is it?
1 person likes this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
4 Nov 12
President Obama appointed two Supreme Court Justices who were of the philosophy of the President. I do beleive both were confirmed with very little problems and most Republicans voting for them. It was the Democrats who told President Bush that he should consult with the Democrat Leadership to select Justices for the Supreme Court. The Republican House passed many bills and sent them to the Senate and Senator Reid refused to hold a vote on them. As Rep Paul Ryan said the way the process is to work the House passes a bill and sends it to the Senate. The Senate then takes up the bill and makes changes and sends it back to the House. If they can't reach an agreement it goes to a conference committee to work out the differences. They can't work things out if the Senate does not vote on a bill.
It is said that President Johnson, Reagan and Clinton were experts at working things out and getting things done by listening to the other side and looking for areas of agreement. You have to talk to each other and the tone was set early in his administration when Speaker Pelosi said “Yes, we wrote the bill. Yes, we won the election.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=aaX0MEqeCGjA
The President talked about working together and being civil but did not argue with this message. He also stated early in his administration when talking to House and Senate Leaders that "I Won".
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17862.html
When Congresswoman Giffort was shot the President called for more Civility and yet has to speak out against what his supporters are saying. He also has run a very negative campaign. The President has talked about working together and reaching out but that is all it is talk.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
12 Nov 12
Give 'em HELL Harry!! Seriously, at least he was straightforward about it instead of holding a secret meeting the night of the Inauguration like GOP leaders did with President Obama.
I realize I have the advantage of posting this after the election but I think the voters have made it clear who they think is the problem in the government. Obviously neither party has wanted things that were the opposite of what they stood for to be passed but I think the Republicans in the Senate were the biggest problem with their abuse of the filibuster. I think now the Republicans know they're going to have to work with the President and the Democrats in Congress or they'll be thrown out in the next election. Their House majority has shrunk considerably and would likely be gone if it weren't for the way the districts were gerrymandered when the GOP redrew them following the 2010 census.
Annie
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
12 Nov 12
You are right the President will have to work with the Republicans in the House. What is his proposal to avoid the failing economy? He can't blame President Bush anymore. It has been his policies for the past four years, his spending and his leadership. It is interesting that the people elected Republicans to control the House, which controls the revenue. Is the message that we want a federal government that does nothing for four more years?
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
3 Nov 12
If only Harry Reid would get a CT scan... maybe he and Biden could get a two-for-one deal if they both went in for one.
This is an attempt to deflate Romney's bipartisan history. It doesn't show Reid in a good light and we know it's simply a threat. When he hasn't got the WH to back him up on his lies and claims, Reid will have to cave. If he doesn't, the voters will see just who are the real obstructionists. The lies won't work anymore.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
4 Nov 12
For those of us who can THINK and who have not looked to the MSM as their only source of information, it is very easy to see which party has the best interests of the country at heart and which party is in it for what benefits them.
While there are many RINOS who have tried to straddle the fence, I think 2010 showed America is waking up to the fact that it should be about what's good for America and not whats good for Washington DC.
Pres. Obama's word to Republicans during the Healthcare debates; I WON
Gov. Romney's word during campaign, I will reach across the aisle and work with Democrats.
Sen. Reid, fat chance. I will not work with you.
America is waking up, liberals you've been exposed as the power hungry weasles you really are.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
12 Nov 12
Thank God we're now seeing there still are some RINOs left! For awhile there I feared they become totally extinct but apparently after the voters spoke last Tuesday they got some much-needed courage and at least a few of them have spoken out. America is waking up alright but I'm afraid you probably wish they'd go back to sleep...lol!!
Annie
Annie





