Sir Sachin Tendulkar V Sir Donald Bradman.

Bradman played 80 Test matches to earn the average of 100.I agree that the accessories were less and so was the technology to understand the weakness of batsmen.And he only played one format.And against just 4 countires.But in modern era,you have three formats, plus the number of games played are also higher.And add to that you play cricket in all formats for over 23 years is no joke.100 centuries and you play against most nations during the time which adds more weightage to Sachin.And you play in different grounds and continue like run machine.The expectations of a billion fans.That double hundred in ODI was something that most never heard of,till Sachin scaled that mountain.He had earned more respects in cricket fraternity than any other cricketer.And then Sachin was Sachin.Very humble and gentleman even when he has scaled big mountains.That is something.From many aspects, Tendulkar is a class apart.Thanks!

Thanks a ton for sharing this discussion. Well i think it would be unfair to compare these two legendary cricket players because both belonged to different eras of cricket. While Bradman was a class apart batsman at a time when no such technology was present, Sachin is a classic batsman in today's era who has given nightmares to all the bowlers he has faced so far. For me both were great players and we should respect the way they had played cricket with such grace and passion. What say?

I think both of them are very good cricket. I have seen Sachin Tendulkar play and have not seen Sir Donald Bradman play. I think both of the are one of the greatest cricket world had every seen.