Your Money Should Die with You. Agree?
@mythociate (21437)
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
April 3, 2013 9:22am CST
Furthermore, 'the amount of money available' (in the whole world) should be directly tied to "the number of people living in it." When a person dies, the amount of monetary-credit they enable in the world (either a set-number for each person, or a lesser 'set number' multiplied by that person's age) should be destroyed.
That way, money-riches are WORTHLESS without the human-life to back them up!
Now, how do we go-about making this into law? (I'm starting by sending this to my Senators & Congressmen http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm http://house.gov/representatives/ & ... do the President & Executive Branch & Supreme Court have such email-lists?)
3 responses
@Jctann (22)
• Malaysia
17 Apr 13
No. absolutely not. it's no meaning by doing this. why don't we leave this money for those needer? no doubt we are living well, but there are a lot people out there which can't even satisfy their essentials. don't need to think of why leave this money to those which are not related, just help. in someday we may also need help. from other perspective, if u don't tell someone about this money and they found by themselves after few years. taking into account of time value of money, the real value of money has dropped, instead of helping 10 people, probably you can only help 5 people. the value of 1 dollar you receive today will more than you receive a year from today.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
25 Apr 13
But 'the more money there is, the less it's worth!'
@maxfashioned (188)
•
4 Apr 13
Greed would win out. Some people would be way rich and others way poor. At least now there is the possibility that the poor can get rich. What if some rich guy was hoarding all the money?
