"New" New Testament

@wapewe (173)
April 12, 2013 8:22am CST
Christians will have a new 10 texts on their bible. For Christians, do you agree or not? http://wwrn.org/articles/39433/?place=united-states It's any possibility that the bible could be taken or added new verses in the past?
5 responses
bestboy19
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
13 Apr 13
A New New Testament is offered at Amazon. It is a separate book from the Bible we know. I believe our Bible is as it is because God chose what it would be. A New New Testament might be a hoot to read, but I don't believe those 10 books were ever meant to be a part of scripture.
bestboy19
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
16 Apr 13
God put into the hearts of the early church what He wanted just as He put into the hearts of the writers what He wanted them to write. Where God's word is concerned, God is in control.
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
16 Apr 13
But not the God who chose them to be added or not in the bible, but the early church. If they really come out from Jesus himself, why they didn't added to the bible?
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
17 Apr 13
Including any errors on the bible?
iuliuxd
@iuliuxd (4453)
• Romania
12 Apr 13
Which Christians ? It is possible for a particular group to do that, but it is not possible for Christians.
iuliuxd
@iuliuxd (4453)
• Romania
13 Apr 13
Every Christian knows that the Bible was "filtered" by the early church. It wasn`t even a bible at that time, the early church created the Bible with the books they considered to be useful.Every useful book is already in the Bible.
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
13 Apr 13
Created and edit by early church? Any chance that they "added" and "hide" some verses?
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
12 Apr 13
Well, I don't know and that was your job as Christian to find out. That 10 texts proven that bible have been filtered at the early church. It's also will make a new founder of manuscript get added to it.
Angel
@nanayangel (7877)
• Philippines
12 Apr 13
Hi there Wapewe! Thank you for sharing that. That is interesting. It says though, that these will be released on March. So far I have not heard anything about it so I hope I can have more information about this.
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
12 Apr 13
So you agree about it? If they add those 10 texts again? Cause look like it has been remove from the bible centuries ago.
Angel
@nanayangel (7877)
• Philippines
13 Apr 13
I agree with Hopefull. They can have it published but not included in the Bible.
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
13 Apr 13
How about the case on that site? It will be added on the bible again or not? Cause from what I have readed, it's has been taken from the bible in the time of early church.
bird123
@bird123 (10658)
• United States
12 Apr 13
Interesting. New information always changes the picture. I think it is a good thing. Hmmm?? Now, we need to figure out why it was left out in the first place. What is it really going to reveal??
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
13 Apr 13
I'm also wondering, if they taken that 10 texts at the early church and hide it. What about the other?
Hopefull90
@Hopefull90 (921)
• United States
12 Apr 13
I think it is alright if they print these things but I don't think it should be added to the Bible. What was included in the article didn't enlighten us on anything.
Hopefull90
@Hopefull90 (921)
• United States
12 Apr 13
As long as it doesn't go against the Bible I would say it was O.K. but I would just as soon it wasn't added as the Bible I have is pretty big and the little one is hard to read so our Bibles would have to be bigger or the print smaller. Neither way works for me.
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
13 Apr 13
It's already taken from the bible at the early church, if I'm not wrong. It mean, it isn't adding a new but more to adding again.
wapewe
@wapewe (173)
•
12 Apr 13
I just share it here, in case some Christians didn't know about it. In case, it really added again. Would you agree? Also, it will give a bad opinions for bible and Christians.