Creationism, Evolution And The Big Bang
@arthurchappell (44941)
Preston, England
January 21, 2016 11:12am CST
Creationists often talk of the Big Bang Theory as if Darwin came up with it, though it was first advocated in 1927 by a Belgian physicist who was also a Catholic priest, Georges Lemaître. His name is sadly forgotten beside those of many other scientists, though the phrase ‘Big Bang Theory’ was suggested in 1949 by Fred Hoyle. Lemaître was quite guarded about letting his religious and scientific work conflict. His theories were also initially met with skepticism by Einstein.
In 1951 the Pope, Pious XII, tried to declare Lemaître’s theory as proof of God starting the creation process but papal advisors and Lemaître advised him to back off, which he did. The Roman Catholics have rarely collided with cosmological science since.
Darwin was a naturalist, and a geologist, not a physicist. He was not concerned professionally with the origin of matter or the beginning of the universe, but with how already existing animals and plants could evolve into new species. His theory was developed 20 years before he finally published conclusions concerning natural selection. Wallace and Darwin became friends and published some papers together.
Creationists going by the opening verses of the book of Genesis, lump very different physio-chemical and biological processes together in one six day creation event beginning with the switching on of celestial light and culminating in a fully grown woman being instantly carved from a stolen rib from a sleeping man who was himself molded from mud.
Darwin’s theories hit a slow burn reaction from the established churches, with atheistic evolutionists such as Thomas Huxley being very aggressive in defense of the science. Religion’s biggest problem was that Darwin claimed that humans evolved from apes rather than having a totally independent divine origin. The conflict peaked in the 1920’s when religious pressure groups started prevented biological, botanical evolution theories being taught in science classes. This conflict peaked in the 1925 Scopes Monkey trial, where a teacher, John Scopes, was successfully prosecuted for teaching evolution theory.
It was 1968 before evolution was allowed back on the teaching curriculums in the US. Since then, Creationists have demanded that their theories of intelligent design be taught in equal measure to evolution theory. Though overall they are losing, Creationists remain frighteningly influential.
Arthur Chappell
7 people like this
7 responses
@WorDazza (15826)
• Manchester, England
21 Jan 16
I have no objection to intelligent design being taught in schools. Just not in science lessons!!
The other thing that really annoys me is when creationists try to debunk evolution by saying that it doesn't explain how life originated on earth!
3 people like this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
21 Jan 16
@WorDazza yes that is one problem with ID - as it was never in the scope of evolution to do so. It's a bit like criticising a carpenter for not being a bricklayer
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
22 Jan 16
@WorDazza Genesis hardly describes anything realistic about the origins of life or matter - it simply throws in a God who is just a convenient space wizard - they might as well say Gandalf or Dumbledore did it
1 person likes this
@WorDazza (15826)
• Manchester, England
22 Jan 16
@arthurchappell I was looking for a neat analogy but couldn't come up with one on the spot!!
1 person likes this

@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
21 Jan 16
it's a real pub I visit from time to time
1 person likes this
@Drosophila (16568)
• Ireland
21 Jan 16
I always wondered if.. just if.. evolution was the method of creation..
Although I seemed to have encountered extreme people who feels it's a 0/1 scenario with no possible in betweens
@Jessicalynnt (50523)
• Centralia, Missouri
22 Jan 16
that is one of the odder pub signs you have shown us
1 person likes this
@Poppylicious (11134)
• United Kingdom
21 Jan 16
I don't know how we came to exist, and accept that we'll never know and that creationists and evolutionists, and everybody in between, will be debating it for a long time after I've been fed to the worms.
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44941)
• Preston, England
22 Jan 16
yes it is not a debate that is ever going to go away
@pgiblett (6524)
• Canada
21 Jan 16
Despite everything Evolution is really only accepted my a minority on this planet. At this time religious orthodoxy is sadly making a return. You are right in that the Big-bang concept and evolution are only broadly linked in that an evolutionist may agree that a big bang is one possible way the universe was created.
To my way of thinking religion is entirely man made, and I am well aware that concept annoys a lot of people. But I also don't agree with a single bang that created the universe, I prefer the theory that supports multiple big bangs with multiple events. Supporting big-ban though does not infer any support for creationism.





.



