Is The King James Version of the Bible, the only "true" Bible?
By Alice Henry
@IreneVincent (15960)
United States
April 9, 2016 12:59am CST
In 2011, many celebrations were held in England to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the “King James Version” of the Bible, also known as the “Authorized Version.” Yes, this Bible has only been around for a little over 400 years to date. It was translated in to English from other languages and other versions of the Bible. You can find this information in the front pages of the "King James Bible."
This version of the Bible is considered a national treasure in that it was named after King James I of England and Prince Charles led the celebration, in 2011.
How did the “King James Version” of the Bible, published for the first time in May, 1611, attain such a unique place in the hearts of English-speaking people?”
After King James I ascended the throne of England, in 1603, he endorsed the making of a NEW Bible translation. He promoted the project by selecting 47 scholars in six separate groups across England to translate sections of the text, using other older Bible translations, such as the “Bishop’s Bible,” the “Geneva Bible” and the Roman Catholic Rheims “New Testament” of 1582, to produce an English version of the Bible, which up until that time was not available in the English language.
Early settlers who landed in North America brought the “Geneva Bible” with them, but later the “King James Version” gained greater acceptance in America.
Of course, over the centuries, many have been led to believe that the “King James Version” is the only “true” Bible. However, work on a full revision of it started in England in 1870, after further study of the Hebrew and Greek languages.
And since then, many different translations and revisions have resulted, such as the “English Revised Version,” the “American Standard Version,” the “Revised Authorised Version” and numerous other English versions.
The original words of the Bible were, of course, written in Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic. The “King James Version” is a literary masterpiece, which is valued for its beauty of expression.
Now, the Bible or parts of the Bible are available in over 2000 different languages and no matter which version you use, you can be sure that the Almighty God has preserved these writings for those who live in this time, and the message from God has not changed. Yes, even though the Bible has been "translated" into different languages, its message has not been altered.
Translating and interpreting are two different things.
4 people like this
4 responses
@PrarieStyle (2486)
• United States
12 Apr 16
I don't trust the King James Bible but for now it's the best out there that I know about. I don't trust it because James was Catholic. Catholicism is at the top of the illuminiti pyramid.
The other Bibles have up to 16 words changed. I've been praying about it and believe God will show me the truth.
1 person likes this

@PrarieStyle (2486)
• United States
15 Apr 16
@IreneVincent I'll check it out. There are quite a few things I don't agree with about Jehovah's Witnesses. Strangely though, the past 3 years I've come to learn that they got it right about not celebrating the pagan holidays.
1 person likes this
@IreneVincent (15960)
• United States
16 Apr 16
@PrarieStyle What are some of the things you don't agree with about Jehovah's Witnesses. I have been learning that they are right about a lot of things.
1 person likes this
@PrarieStyle (2486)
• United States
17 Apr 16
@IreneVincent First off, it's a cult that is ruled by fear. Second, it's linked with Freemasonry/illuminati.
Here's a video that may wake you up.
They deny the deity of Christ by not believing He is God.
I don't have any denomination. Jesus didn't have one.
Are you one?
These 5 facts revolve around the Watchtower, Knights Tempar, Freemasonry, subliminal images / messages, the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures, the...
1 person likes this

@HebrewGreekStudies (1646)
• Canada
10 Apr 16
It was my denomination which translated the KJV-and interestingly enough...it's often we who disregard it more then anyone. Most of my professors used to just slam it. The idea that some take for the authority of the KJV is that it is royally commissoned, but that is an inconsistent argument, because by that argument if the KJV is the only true translation for that reason, well, then they should be Anglicans, because we translated it. Yet as I said, not even we dare make the assertion that the KJV is the only true translation-and we certainly don't make the claim that we are the only true group of Christians. But the truth is, as far as translation goes, the KJV isn't that bad...the real 2 issues are that some words have very different meaning now then they did then-as well there is certain debate about the manuscripts used for the New Testament. There are a few ecclesiastical terms which are translated inconsistently (ie re. the "overseers" in Acts 20), but strictly speaking, the translation isn't incorrect, they just used low ecclesiastical language. I would say, as I said on one of my posts, there is no "perfect" translation, but the KJV isn't as horrible as some would claim...nor is it the Divine authority that others claim.
1 person likes this
@IreneVincent (15960)
• United States
11 Apr 16
Yes, we don't speak 17th century English anymore, but I understand that the KJV is the Bible that Pocahontas used to learn to speak English and that she had personally MET King James I when her husband took her to England.
There are lots of modern English versions of the Bible now and many other versions in other languages. There is a web site where you can read the Bible in many different languages. Did I mention it to you before?
Jehovah’s Witnesses: Our official website provides online access to the Bible, Bible-based publications, and current news. It describes our beliefs and organization.
1 person likes this
@IreneVincent (15960)
• United States
11 Apr 16
@HebrewGreekStudies I think that web site might have the Bible in Greek and Hebrew but I'm not sure. I'll check it out.
Yes, I just looked at all the languages and both Greek and Hebrew are there.
1 person likes this
@HebrewGreekStudies (1646)
• Canada
11 Apr 16
@IreneVincent yup, you mentioned it before, thank you:). I've had the Bible in it's original languages since my youth, and went to University to study it and I teach Hebrew, so I usually prefer to stick to the original languages.
1 person likes this

@puddleglum (1380)
• United States
9 Apr 16
The King James is still my favorite version for its expression, and it's the one from which I like to memorize passages. For reading and study, I like many versions, including the New Revised Standard Version, which is the one read in my church.
1 person likes this
@IreneVincent (15960)
• United States
11 Apr 16
Yes, the King James Version is very well liked for its expression and when persons memorize texts, they do like to use the KJV . For modern translations I prefer the New World Translation and I also like the way the Living Bible puts things in very simple language, easy to understand.






