Is it desirable not to show the early conquests of Bajirao in Bajirao Mastani?

April 26, 2016 10:27pm CST
In the film, none of Baji Rao’s early conquests before the battle against Mohammad Khan Banghaz was shown. He fought many battles between 1721 and 1727. These were the battles where his skills as a soldier was manifested. He had the capability of reaching the battlefield faster with his troops than others. So in many cases the enemies were half-prepared when he entered the battlefield. Baji Rao’s attention towards Mastani and ignorance of Kashi Bai led to the anger of his mother Radhabai. Bajirao’s brother Chimnaji Appa, tried to send Mastani into exile. Baji Rao’s son, Balaji, also tried to coerce Mastani into leaving his father. But she refused to do so. Balaji later had Mastani placed under house arrest when Baji Rao was under military campaign. Mastani lived with Baji Rao 1 in the palace Shaniwar Wada in Pune. Due to intolerance of the family towards Mastani, later Baji Rao later made a separate residence at Kothrud in 1737.
1 person likes this
1 response
@karjatwala (1120)
• Pune, India
27 Apr 16
Movies are made to have earnings for the producers and the team of the film. Not to show what has happened but what the crowd will like watching.
27 Apr 16
Dear Mohammad Karjatwala. Thanks for the comments. Please continue commenting.
1 person likes this
• Pune, India
27 Apr 16
@sathviksouvik Yes sure, love to share my thoughts to the world at large.