Should Cricket players get paid even if they dont perform?

@ravi571 (319)
Greece
November 25, 2006 12:00am CST
This has been a very recent discussion. Should they be paid even if they score ducks or does not take any wickets. To me, they should not be paid. Cricket is a professional game and in any profession, perform and get paid. There is a negative side to it. Players might get demotivated and lose their fire.anyways, Please drop in ur feelings on this.cheers!
4 responses
• Indonesia
25 Nov 06
yes ok
1 person likes this
@ravi571 (319)
• Greece
26 Nov 06
thanks for agreeing for that. I see a lot of support to my opinion. Cheers!
@shi_2000_21 (2681)
• India
25 Nov 06
The board should bring a policy to deduct the match fees if the players do not perform well in the matches. They should place a ban players endorsing products.
1 person likes this
@ravi571 (319)
• Greece
25 Nov 06
well, i think banning players from endorsing products is a little too harsh. I mean thats like paying price for something they dint do. I feel endorsing products ia llright as long as its only endorsing and does not affect the attitude of the players.Again, its not easy to decide attitude. Anyways good post. Cheers
@satlove (1111)
• India
25 Nov 06
i think they should be paid according to their performance.......after 91 runs should they expect a huge money????
1 person likes this
@ravi571 (319)
• Greece
25 Nov 06
well...lets leave the numbers to the selectors, but as u said, get paid for what they do is quite reasonable.
• India
25 Nov 06
Mhhhhhhhh can say tht they must be fined for not performing up to the level .......
1 person likes this
@ravi571 (319)
• Greece
25 Nov 06
well, the idea is still the same. Getting fined is as good as reducing the pay. glad i have some support:)