Forget Political Parties - What do You want to See America Become?

@OneOfMany (12150)
United States
August 10, 2016 6:39am CST
I'm tired of the war between parties and the characters that represent them. What do you want to see happen in this country and how do you think we can arrive at that point? Remember that what any political candidate says is not what they will end up doing. Being aware of people's track records in their daily lives is what to base decisions off of, because in front of the camera it can all change. I want to see a strong economy and a small % flat income tax for everyone that works. I want to see everyone that is on welfare work community service hours to earn full benefits, or have a diminishing returns policy based on their efforts. Having a third of the working population, working again would be enormous to helping the economy. Remember that there is Social Security for the retired and special circumstances for disabled, so they are not factored in, but even they have skills that can be utilized. As part of the above, it should be made that businesses have an easier time operating here than moving over seas. Jobs are vital for our communities, and even under 100 people displaced takes a lot of currency out of circulation, let alone thousands. I want to see the notion of 'political correctness' abolished, because all it is, is a side-stepped form of censorship. We don't need to be censored, since all that does is create annoying situations. I want the heath care system reworked because having the old mode of competition among hospitals made it easier to afford health care, and new sites and businesses that pinpoint prescription medicines are making it far less expensive than it has been with insurance. Options make things better, and middle men make things worse. States need to decide things for themselves, because we are not a 'one size fits all' nation. The cost of living in rural Pennsylvania is not anywhere near what it is in California. Trying to decide a minimum wage based on that is ridiculous, and remember that the entire scale of the economy gets messed up to compensate for the raise. If anything, lower the cost of living by being strategic about energy and basic costs and it will do far more to boost everyone. Not spending money is much better than earning a little more. It's time for technology to actually start helping us save money rather than it being used to make things more expensive. I would like lost technology to be restored by pressuring the big oil companies and getting them to back off. Of course, I don't expect that any time soon, but having a car getting a hundred miles to the gallon was something that was around in the 1970s, I sure would like to have that technology available today. And there's more, but I don't want to write a report about it. I would like to hear what you want to have happen, preferably with a little realism and intelligence behind the answers.
6 people like this
9 responses
@Talknpen (1820)
• United States
10 Aug 16
Good day By Morgan. It is not so much about what I want America to become, but what I want the world to become. America is where the dream of a higher technology is created, freedom of speech is cherished, and voting is something that most people can choose to do when they come of age. The rest of the world should follow that example. With all of the promise America afforded its citizens with technology, freedom of speech, and voting it should be open to making changes where necessary and maintaining what is most precious: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2 people like this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
@Talknpen Yes, but I don't think we can rely on politicians to make the good decisions. The people will have to have a louder voice to be heard.
@Talknpen (1820)
• United States
10 Aug 16
@OneOfMany l guess more time will tell where America is going.
1 person likes this
@Talknpen (1820)
• United States
10 Aug 16
@OneOfMany I agree that the politicians cannot be solely relied on. They need to listen to the people and work with them.
1 person likes this
@Bluedoll (16774)
• Canada
15 Aug 16
you have my vote or is it too late?
2 people like this
@Bluedoll (16774)
• Canada
15 Aug 16
@OneOfMany Sounds like freedom true. Sadly, the present economic systems by nature does make claim and if it doesn't, it doesn't give anything, they lend it with conditions or interest. The money system perhaps evolved from barter or still is just another form of barter, I'm not sure. Someone has to say, "this is not for sale".
2 people like this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
15 Aug 16
@Bluedoll Well, once upon a time we 'lived' in our homes. Now people shuffle from one to the next. I would like to bring back the age where people not only live in their homes but benefit by doing so. That's why I want to build one of my own, so I can benefit from what I put into it. Once upon a time, a man's home was his castle. Now it's his cave. :P In the case of the ladies out there, I guess it's gone from palace to closet.
2 people like this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
15 Aug 16
It might be too late. Sadly I wouldn't be able to help anyone in the position of President or any part of government. Perhaps it's time to make a separate movement within the current system. I don't know how to keep it free from the hands of greed that wish to claim all things as their own. In another world I called it the "Barters' Guild" and it rose to power and claimed power over most of the northern hemisphere, but it didn't force cultures and religions to bend to its will, it left the people free in their choices. It gave people solidarity and protection while being true to themselves and having freedom of possessing lives they wanted to live while not having an attachment to money. It was a nice world, but it took hundreds of years to get it right. I don't think such a system is capable in this lifetime.
1 person likes this
@crossbones27 (48446)
• Mojave, California
10 Aug 16
I always wonder why I cannot find people like you where I live. This is such a taboo mindset, but one I agree with.
1 person likes this
• Mojave, California
10 Aug 16
@OneOfMany It is hard to disagree in this world.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
@crossbones27 I do it all the time though. It helps that I'm a world builder in writing, because I'm not bound to the same rules that everyone else seems to be bound to.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
It's probably because getting to all of these points of understanding require years of paying attention and living the different situations. Real world experience and research are necessary to fully come to terms with reality, and living in a media influenced bubble is not helpful. I'm not sure when practicality became taboo, but it is something we need to both address and reverse if we ever want a prosperous future for this country. As my father stated the other day "It's hard to believe how this country could go to hell in just the last 30 years." My brother lives out in Fremont, California, and though he doesn't necessarily agree with all my points, he has a good mindset as well. He works for Twitter.
1 person likes this
@Jessicalynnt (50525)
• Centralia, Missouri
10 Aug 16
I want to see it become more affordable to adopt, the process itself should be free, the money one "spends" should be put into accounts for emergencies, and such
1 person likes this
• Centralia, Missouri
10 Aug 16
@OneOfMany I know many who have told me it costs and costs and costs, just to even GET the child. I understand they want to be sure you are fit, but wouldnt those costs be better put into accounts to help with healthcare and stuff?
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
You'd think adoption would be a welcome process. I guess there are many middle men in that process as well.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
@Jessicalynnt Or the future welfare of the child should something happen. I supposed they are making sure certain things, but they could always have a background investigation done and that would be good enough.
1 person likes this
@WorDazza (15833)
• Manchester, England
10 Aug 16
Even in a country as small (relatively) as the UK we have a two-tier minimum wage. One for the Greater London area and a lower one for the rest of the country.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
It just makes sense. After all, in my part of Pennsylvania a $30k home here might cost $800k in California. You can't set the bar with that big of a difference.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
@WorDazza Politicians should be tested on economics periodically and those that fail are ineligible for re-election. If they don't know economic theory behind the lives of those they are in charge of, then they are in the wrong business.
1 person likes this
@WorDazza (15833)
• Manchester, England
10 Aug 16
@OneOfMany But it is much easier for politicians to understand when there's a one size fits all approach. Or should that be a one size fits nobody approach!!
1 person likes this
• New Delhi, India
10 Aug 16
I love America and its culture. Best after India in culture. But after Donald trump statements and a negative point of view for us I think I am happy with my country
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
It's good to be happy about your country. I think the system of the US government should be built with people that pass training courses, tests and simulations until they are deemed prepared. And then they will be tested regularly for competency. They make people in high professions take tests all the time. Shouldn't that apply for the highest profession out there as well?
• New Delhi, India
10 Aug 16
@OneOfMany we didn't mind it.
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
10 Aug 16
@ModernDayWriter I'm just saying what should hold true. After all, we're past the days of unintelligent kings and queens.
@PatZAnthony (14752)
• Charlotte, North Carolina
24 Aug 16
That is a tough question. Some think putting parents in charge who have to struggle to pay their bills and raise children with inadequate housing and insurance could make a difference. These ones might really know what is needed and be able to balance the budget.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
24 Aug 16
Certainly, someone living in the real world will have insight over what a fantasy world politician thinks. Most that operate in Washington never really leave it to find out what the rest of the country is like. They work in the #2 economic growth city in the country. I doubt very much that they look around at the people living elsewhere.
@JESSY3236 (18921)
• United States
11 Aug 16
I don't think any of us will get what we want. The government won't give it to us because they did, there would no control.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
11 Aug 16
Certainly, that's their biggest reason for what they do. They keep control by holding the cards. However, they weren't supposed to exist that way when the country was founded. It's become corrupt as the years went by and people got away with things.
1 person likes this
@Hanyouyomi (2187)
• Dallas, Texas
11 Aug 16
After reading this post I thought I was the only one who wanted a stable economy giving jobs who theose in need, states that handle their own $h!t instead of dumping it all on the White House and Pentagon, a country that treats that treats everyone like individuals, and my absolute favorite:"abolishing political correctness." Political Correctness is a shield that says:"I'm not racist/sexist/homophobic/xenophobic, I swear." Problem with that is unlike the rest of the people blinded by this shroud, I can tell when a white person isn't racist. There's a big f'ing difference between bigotry and ignorance, and I've seen it. But you wanna know the problem? I know this'll never happen because it's easier to govern a generalized mass that individuals. That's the problem with our ideal America, as it's filled with individuals who can govern themselves on more than on occasion, thus our government has no real power over them, unless it effects the entire U.S.A. And the powers that be who's been maintaining this cycle an't relinquish that.
1 person likes this
@OneOfMany (12150)
• United States
11 Aug 16
The notion of giving everyone a fair playing field went out the window a long time ago. I think the government is paranoid, because I know so many people that would love stability and use it on raising families and doing well in business without ever thinking about jumping in on the power circle band wagon. If it's a few individuals that are the problem, then they can deal with them. If they let the situation have its own freedom, then a better tomorrow could be reached sooner than anyone ever expects. I'm idealistic to think that it might happen. All I have to do is hope lightning strikes enough of the people in charge of the mess, and then we're home free!