Civil Rights Hero, Unrepentant Racist, or Race Traitor

This is what white supremacy looks like.
@DWDavis (25797)
United States
January 16, 2017 10:10am CST
Could Lyndon B. Johnson have been all these things? It depends on who you ask. To the hardline segregationists of the south, LBJ, once one of the stalwarts of white supremacy, who fought every piece of Civil Rights legislation ever to move through Congress during his tenure as a Representative from Texas, was a Race Traitor. To the black people who worked for him or interviewed him, LBJ was an Unrepentant Racist who once told his chauffer to never expect to be called by his first name and to get by pretending to be a piece of the furniture. (Parker, Robert; Capitol Hill in Black and White; Dodd, Mead & Co; 1986) History treats LBJ as a Civil Rights Hero for switching sides and helping pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 (which he referred to as the n****r bill), and then as President signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Historians are quick to point out that LBJ would never have signed these bills had Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr and the movement he led not forced his hand. LBJ kept making empty promises to MLK, time after time, until time ran out for him and LBJ either got those bills passed and signed them, or face a second civil war. Perhaps the most despicable thing LBJ ever did was get J. Edgar Hoover, leader of the FBI, to fake a tape of Dr. King with another woman and have it delivered to Coretta, in an effort to discredit Dr. King and sabotage the Civil Rights movement. So, was LBJ an Unrepentant Racist? Almost certainly. Was he a Race Traitor? From the point of view of the segregationists and white supremacists in the south, he was. Was he a Civil Rights Hero? Not of his own free will, perhaps, but the bills he signed into law, and the actions that followed, set the stage for the greatest advances in Civil Rights here in the United States since emancipation. On this day when the US celebrates the life, work, and legacy of Dr. King, I feel it is only appropriate to take a look at the man whose actions in response to Dr. King's work helped Dr. King change a nation.
6 people like this
6 responses
@DianneN (254926)
• United States
17 Jan 17
Great post. Very interesting.
1 person likes this
@DWDavis (25797)
• United States
17 Jan 17
Thank you. Considering how he became President and all that went on while he was President, it seems most people don't know much about LBJ.
1 person likes this
@DianneN (254926)
• United States
17 Jan 17
1 person likes this
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
16 Jan 17
LBJ promoted civil rights as a means to placate minorities and keep them in the Democrat voting pool. You may approve of his bills but make no mistake that LBJ was a ruthless politician who despised JFK.
1 person likes this
@DWDavis (25797)
• United States
16 Jan 17
I have always despised LBJ. Not just for his racism, but the fact the he kept the Vietnam War going, instead of taking steps to end it, to enrich his cronies in the military defense contracting business. I do honestly believe he signed the CVA of '64 and the VRA of '65 more out of fear of a racial war breaking out in the south than any plan to make welfare slaves out of blacks. Enacting Medicare didn't necessarily make Democrat voters out of the elderly.
1 person likes this
@JohnRoberts (109841)
• Los Angeles, California
16 Jan 17
@DWDavis Yes, I agree about Vietnam. Nixon was always vilified over Vietnam and liberals forget LBJ's role.
1 person likes this
• Pamplona, Spain
17 Jan 17
Third time I am lost again. No idea that he could be that way honest. I know who he was by name but nothing else. At School we never learned about anything much in History except things like the Battle of Hastings 1066 that sort of thing and after leaving School at College it was all about learning your Job.
• Pamplona, Spain
17 Jan 17
On the Television you never got to know that kind of thing either. Just did not exist at that time. When I mention History its because we never had to learn about anyone so new rather the reverse. We never got to learn even about Abraham Lincoln either so that is what I am really trying to explain. Great image though.
1 person likes this
• Pamplona, Spain
18 Jan 17
@DWDavis Thank you. It comes in handy to know about how people were that is so very true. For example there is someone I know that thinks a certain someone in History is a Hero and I said none of that look what that person did the misery that person caused to countless people.
1 person likes this
@DWDavis (25797)
• United States
18 Jan 17
@lovinangelsinstead21 Each year, whether I'm teaching Social Studies that year or not, I always do a lesson on Dr. King and the Civil Rights Movement. I try to include information that is not included in the sanitized version of the history of the times because I feel it is important for my students to know what the people involved were really like and what they truly stood for.
1 person likes this
@jstory07 (148764)
• Roseburg, Oregon
17 Jan 17
History will change when we look at everywhere..
1 person likes this
@DWDavis (25797)
• United States
17 Jan 17
History tends to gloss over a lot of things, until it becomes politically convenient to dredge them up again.
@just4him (323168)
• Green Bay, Wisconsin
17 Jan 17
He comes from an era when most white people were racist. It's how they grew up. They didn't know any better. Am I sticking up for him - no. I've just seen a lot of it in people from that era, my late father-in-law one of them and very racist. President Johnson did do some good with getting that legislation passed. It would have been bad to go into another civil war. Right or wrong, he did accomplish something during his time in office.
1 person likes this
@tzwrites (4835)
• Romania
16 Jan 17
He was a nasty fellow
1 person likes this