What Is a Megalosaurus?

United States
February 7, 2017 1:03pm CST
It is a known fact that many bone fragments that have been discovered have been identified as "dinosaur" bones, in spite of the fact that scientists tell us that what they have named "dinosaurs" lived and died millions of years ago and that these bones have been in the ground for millions of years. So what is a Megalosaurus? Just one more pieced together “dinosaur.” William Buckland, Professor of Geology at the University of Oxford and dean of Christ Church acquired several bones that were discovered by John Kidd in 1815 at the Stonesfield quarry. William Buckland was urged on by an anatomist, Georges Curvier, to continue working on the subject, even though Buckland was aware that these bones DID NOT BELONG TO THE SAME INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL. He had a “piece of a right lower jaw with a single erupted tooth.” There was a “posterior dorsal vertebra, an anterior caudal vertebra, a cervical rib,” and a few other fragments. Wikipedia says “ because they (the bones) represented several individuals, the described fossils formed a syntype series. By modern standards, from these a single specimen has to be selected, on which the name is based. “Megalosuarus” was the name chosen. So the truth is, that they took bones from different individual animals, KNOWING that the bones did NOT belong to the same animal, pieced something together and named a NEW SPECIES that they called Megalosaurus. This is the regular process that has been used to INVENT dinosaurs. So what is person to believe? I ask you.
1 person likes this
1 response
@topffer (42155)
• France
7 Feb 17
Dinosaurs bones found in sand pits and quarries can be isolated, and it is not scientifically wrong to use bones from various skeletons to reconstitute a complete skeleton. Besides complete skeletons are found times to times.
1 person likes this
• United States
7 Feb 17
I think it IS scientifically WRONG to use bones from various skeletons to reconstitute a complete skeleton. It's fraudulent as far as I am concerned. Just my humble opinion.
1 person likes this
@topffer (42155)
• France
7 Feb 17
@IreneVincent If you can determine that it is the same species, there is nothing wrong. I work on Roman potteries since decades, and we do the same for potteries : we can get the complete shape of a pottery with fragments coming from several potteries of the same model...
1 person likes this
@topffer (42155)
• France
7 Feb 17
I was living in front of the Paris Museum where Cuvier worked when I was a toddler and I was seeing the dinosaurs from my room. I cannot find a view of the old gallery, but this is a photo of the new gallery of the Museum of Natural History, and all these dinosaurs have been found in anatomical connection, so they have not been "invented".
1 person likes this