Here's a Simple Math Problem For Trump Supporters
By anniepa
@anniepa (27955)
United States
February 18, 2017 3:03pm CST
Which number is the lowest - 304, 332, 365, 370 or 379?
Which margin of victory is the smallest or isn't really a victory at all - + 5 million, + 7 million, + 10 million, + 5 million (again) or - (that's MINUS, Trumpsters) 3 million?
I ask this because the so-called President Agent Orange has been bragging incessantly about his "YUGE" electoral vote and about his mandate and how the "American people" want HIM and only HIM to pretty much rule over every aspect of our lives and to hell with the other two branches of our government but if you "believe" in math as opposed to "alternative facts" you'll see the last two Democrats who occupied the White House got considerably higher numbers of electoral votes in both of their elections and actually WON the popular vote as well by healthy margins. Trumpsters thought these men didn't really have a mandate, that they deserved to be obstructed every step of the way, so how could they possibly think the orange one has more of the American people on his side than these TWO TERM PRESIDENTS?
In the name of bipartisanship I'd like to add that two of the last three GOP Presidents also had much higher totals than the one who thinks he's won bigger victories than anyone in the history of the world!
As the brave reporter who called him out during that manic press conference said, how can he expect people to trust him when he blatantly lies about things that are so widely known and can be instantly fact-checked?
4 people like this
4 responses
@DWDavis (25797)
• United States
18 Feb 17
You have to understand that under Herr Trump's orange sky, and using Million Man Math, 304 in 2016 is more than 379 in 1996 because of inflation. Herr Trump won't accept the fact that he got 3 Million votes less than Hillary, even if you discount all the votes she received from Spanish-American War Veterans, and that 10,000,000 more people voted against him than voted for him.
2 people like this
@crossbones27 (52920)
• Mojave, California
18 Feb 17
@DWDavis That is a great point. Why is Trump only concerned with the 3 million more that Hilary got over him than the 10 million that voted against him. Someone must have failed to mention that part and think the media should bring that up at his next press conference so we can see his fragile ego melt down on stage. 
2 people like this
@crossbones27 (52920)
• Mojave, California
18 Feb 17
What has happened to the party of Reagan? Hardly any mentions of Reagan this past election and one thing is for sure. When George W and John McCain was running in both elections. All I remember hearing is how Democrats have no morals or ethics. Morals and ethics were not even mentioned by the Republicans this election. I wonder why that was!
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
18 Feb 17
ROFLMFAO!! I'm sorry, I couldn't help it, "morals and ethics" being mentioned when we have that creature in the White House just struck me as so hilarious. Donald has broken every ethical standard there is in less than a month in office and he's never known what morals are.
I didn't vote for Reagan but I know he was a decent person despite my political disagreements with him and I also know he couldn't get elected dog-catcher in today's GOP.
2 people like this
@PainsOnSlate (21845)
• Canada
18 Feb 17
He has no filter, he wanders in his head and makes up numbers that make him feel better. He's like a small child having a tantrum because he doesn't get his way, poor baby, I am waiting for him to explode...
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
19 Feb 17
What's really disturbing is how he was told in no uncertain terms on Thursday that his electoral vote total was lower than that of the winners of 5 elections since Reagan but he STILL made the claim tonight that he'd had the highest total in modern history. If very simple arithmetic doesn't sink in that thick skull how can he possibly absorb his daily intelligence briefings, assuming he even bothers getting them these days!
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Feb 17
@PainsOnSlate It's unbelievable that after having the absolutely worst first four weeks in history for any President he had the nerve to hold a campaign rally where gullible supporters were holding signs about 2020.
2 people like this
@PainsOnSlate (21845)
• Canada
19 Feb 17
@anniepa it is very scary, he certainly doesn't have the intelligence or the ability to be president. Seeing how many of his fans showed up in Florida made me wonder if he paid them to be there...
1 person likes this
@owlandbutterfly (304)
• United States
18 Feb 17
He doesn't care if people trust him. He's going to do what he wants to do, regardless of how much it costs the American people. As long as he's able to boost his ego, who cares about pesky little things like the truth?
1 person likes this
@owlandbutterfly (304)
• United States
20 Feb 17
@anniepa They really don't care, and some of them are just as bad as he is. I was reading through my mother's Facebook page last night, and she has all sorts of memes on there supporting Trump that claim he's the only President who's ever dealt with "this much bullshit on a daily basis." I guess the past 8 years (and all the BS they heaped on Obama during his terms) have just gone out the window... 
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Feb 17
@owlandbutterfly Isn't it amazing how much abuse and injustice this "poor" white billionaire and his family have had to endure? I mean, give me an effing break!
1 person likes this
