Serious discussion: Cancer treatment.
By Lynn Fowler
@lynnief (1203)
Australia
March 26, 2018 9:04pm CST
Just so nobody gets the wrong idea, let me say clearly that I do not have any form of cancer, neither does anybody I currently know personally (though I have lost a few friends to it in the past.) This discussion is purely academic, and is prompted by a book I have just finished reading, about a guy who is dying with cancer.
Cancer is still one of the most frightening words in the English language. How do you think you would you respond if you were given a cancer diagnosis? Would you go for the traditional methods of "Cut, Poison, Burn" (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy?) Or would you want to try alternative methods?
Of course it is impossible for us to say with certainty how we would react in that situation, but from my present safe position I think that I would go for alternatives. The traditional methods knock out the patient's immune system, and to me it makes no sense at all to do that at the very time when you most need your immune system to do the thing for which God created it, namely to attack the bad guys (in this case the cancer cells.) To me, it makes more sense to strengthen the immune system as much as possible to help it to get on with the job.
Like I said, I don't have cancer, and I can't know for sure how I would feel if I did. Maybe I would just grab whatever the docs offered at the time. But I don't think so.
6 people like this
3 responses
@marguicha (230350)
• Chile
27 Mar 18
I will not answer by a book. I have a lymphoma on remission. I was diagnosed late: in was already on stage 4. There was no possibility of cutting or burning it as you say: the thing was very near a main artery. The only offering that medicine gave me was chemotherapy. I could either react well or bad from it. No one could the tell that it would work for sure. I took the chance. There are several side effects of chemo and they don´t go away. But I am here. As I said, the cancer is on remission (this one has no complete cure). During chemo I had a special diet and my house was as clean as anyone could have it.
@marguicha (230350)
• Chile
27 Mar 18
@lynnief I´m very glad. Although now I have to cope with other things. But I´m alive.
1 person likes this
@1hopefulman (45111)
• Canada
28 Mar 18
I think that what is best is to live in a way so that we don't get cancer.
@Starmaiden (9308)
• Canada
27 Mar 18
I was diagnosed with cervical cancer back in 2010. It is not a pleasant experience. I lost many nights of sleeping worrying about what will happen to me.
Thank God I had a very honest GYN. He told me that surgery (hysterectomy) was the only option. I asked him about chemotherapy or radiation and he absolutely refused. He told me my cancer was of the aggressive nature and when cancer cells feel that they are under attack, they become more aggressive and spread faster. The only option for me was surgery. I have had no problems since.
I too believe that these harsh treatments for cancer destroy the immune system. My mother had two rounds of chemo for her ovarian cancer and it had spread quickly through her entire body. She refused a third round and succumbed to her disease. :-(
@lynnief (1203)
• Australia
27 Mar 18
The comment from your GYN is very interesting. This is something I have suspected for a long time, but I have never before heard of it being expressed by someone who could be considered an "authority." Glad to know your cancer has been dealt with, but sad about your Mum.
1 person likes this



