Art Study Jan Van Eyck The Arnolfini Portrait

Preston, England
September 27, 2018 3:52pm CST
1434 Renaissance masterpiece, in oil on oak panelling. A portrait by the early Dutch Master Van Eyck of the Bruges based aristocratic Giovanni Di Nicoli Arnolfini and his pregnant wife, in their own house. The paint is layered thickly, to give a depth and clear colouring, as well as a three dimensional feel. The couple hold hands and the lighting illuminates their plush luxurious surroundings. A cherry tree can be seen through the window. The really clever touch is the large mirror showing the view back across the room, and really packing a lot of room into a quite compressed space. The mirror frame is decorated in religious imagery. A Brussell's Griffin dog is portrayed and Van Eyck himself is one of the figures seen in the mirror's reflection. The identity of the wife is something of a mystery. Giovanni was not married in 1434, so the image is either a betrothal prediction of a wedding to come, or a mourning portrait of his first wife who died before the portrait was created. The cherry tree being in full Summer bloom is in contrast to the heavy winter wear the couple are dressed in. It was traditional to show wealth by dressing art subjects in as many rich clothes as possible at this time. The portrait Arthur Chappell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search The Arnolfini Portrait Artist Jan van EyckYear 1434Type Oil on oak panel of 3 vertical boardsDimensions 82.2 cm × 60 cm (32.4 in × 23.6 in); panel 84.5 cm × 62.5 cm (33.3 in × 24.6 in)
4 people like this
5 responses
@Courage7 (19626)
• United States
28 Sep 18
I must be blind because I could not find a cherry tree anywhere but that dog is so cute haha It is really good the reflection in the mirror.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
28 Sep 18
@Courage7 you can see a few branches of the tree through the window - not too clear on the small scale the image allows here
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
28 Sep 18
@Courage7 I wouldn't have noticed without seeing the tree referenced in some of my books on art
1 person likes this
@Courage7 (19626)
• United States
28 Sep 18
@arthurchappell Oh I see, I was looking and looking and couldnt see them.
1 person likes this
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
1 Oct 18
My understanding is that the wife is not pregnant, although it certainly looks that way. I read somewhere that this form of dress was the fashion at the time - although it looks distinctly unflattering to me!
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
1 Oct 18
@indexer I have seen the theory that she may not be pregnant too - the art critics are divided on that apparently
• United States
28 Sep 18
i always thought the mirror was the best part of the painting.pretty amazing perspective for then.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
28 Sep 18
@scarlet_woman it is a brilliant touch
1 person likes this
@GreatMartin (23670)
• Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
28 Sep 18
When I was a wee lad and saw the picture for the first time I was very wise (or is that a smart XXXX?) and I immediately remarked about " the large mirror showing the view back across the room"!! Funny---the word I was using after smart was a British version of buns and it was censored as a bad word!
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
28 Sep 18
trying to think what the word might be now @GreatMartin - only one springs to mind
@amadeo (111937)
• United States
27 Sep 18
I am not aware of this artist .The painting I love. Thank you
1 person likes this