Why the fixed form of shortS, sockS, pantS and shoeS? How to explain this grammar point to students?
By Melissa
@Behindtheguitarbar (2831)
Guangdong, China
November 30, 2018 1:23am CST
Guys, recently my students have learned the new words about clothes.
Such as: jacket, pants, shorts, shoes, socks, T-shirt, shirt, sweater and etc.
However, there is a question that need to be explained in details.
Why shoes, socks and shorts, pants and trousers have their plural forms at first, but jacket, T-shirt, shirt, sweater don't?
WHY?
When I was a student, my English teacher told me nothing about it, just said it was.
5 people like this
5 responses
@Behindtheguitarbar (2831)
• Guangdong, China
3 Dec 18
I explained to my students and they finally got it. Thanks all.
1 person likes this
@Behindtheguitarbar (2831)
• Guangdong, China
3 Dec 18
@Janet357 well, some are so naughty that make you angry all day long
1 person likes this
@just4him (323168)
• Green Bay, Wisconsin
1 Dec 18
I would think because you're dealing with two. Two legs, two feet. You only have one torso. I've never given it a thought before, but it's the best reason I can think of.
@Behindtheguitarbar (2831)
• Guangdong, China
3 Dec 18
oh, I see. That's a good explanation.
2 people like this
@Mavic123456 (21891)
• Thailand
30 Nov 18
what I know is if you use pant or a trouser, then your half butt will show.
@Plethos (13718)
• United States
30 Nov 18
shoes and socks because theres two of them or else youd be asking for one sock or one shoe.
shorts, pants and trousers because they cover two legs. you dont call it a skirts, or dresses because it just goes over with one opening over your legs. not two openings like pants. well, thats what my brain tells me, my brain has been known to make stuff up , so youre on your own 
