Not Naming any Names, but ... Such a Cowardly Tactic!

Tweet

I say things with which others disagree---perhaps they're right; and I WANT to seem open-minded, but they won't hear 'why I think I'm right,' and/or can't tell me why my reasoning's wrong (at least not without sliding into a puddle of name-calling). The 'tactic' I'm talking-about is sort of a 'cheater's strategy for having the last word'---they ignore whatever I've just said (in a thread of messages,' make one last lying-, name calling-statement, and then BLOCK me making any statements in reply! I mean, I get it if they're ashamed of how stubborn they are (or maybe they actually think it's 'they're annoyed at how stubborn I am); but ... it's just rude I think it's better--if you want to block someone--to just block them (without saying anything about it). Sure, maybe it's just as "cowardly"; but I think it's more mature.