The six year old who shot his teacher
By Sissy15
@sissy15 (13543)
United States
October 10, 2026 1:25pm CST
Along with the Christa Pike story, there has been another one circulating, the one where the video footage from when a 6-year-old boy shot his teacher. It wasn't an accident; the child knew what he was doing, and the mouth on him was insane.
He was shouting and cussing, and I just can't imagine a child that age speaking that way. There are people going off about how that child is a little thug and saying he deserved more than what he got. Here's the thing: he is a child. He didn't come into the world knowing those things. He was taught. He was clearly in a situation he shouldn't be in. He was so young that there was still time to get him help, and from what I've read, it looks like he got that help. His great-grandfather is now raising him. Children learn from their surroundings. His mother was sent to prison over the situation as she should be, although in my opinion she should have had more time than the I think it was two years she got.
A six-year-old may know what he's doing on some level, but isn't old enough to fully understand the ramifications of it. He only knows what he's exposed to. The woman in that video who is holding him and speaking to him as though he didn't just do what he did deserves a medal. That boy could have killed his teacher and nearly did. The teacher he shot had to step down from teaching for medical reasons after that and will have medical issues for the rest of her life because of this child, or maybe I should say because of the adults who failed that child.
I have so many thoughts about this situation as someone who works in a school and who has to deal with the actions of children on a daily basis. I have been spit at, stabbed with a pencil, hit, pinched, and called every name in the book. I am expected to tolerate it. They are children, and they are products of their environments. I understand that children are dealing with a lot at home. I understand the need for empathy and compassion. I understand that the child who shot his teacher still deserves that empathy and compassion because he was only 6. In his own way, he was also a victim. The biggest problem I have is: why was this allowed to happen?
Something was happening with this child long before he got hold of that gun. How much are teachers expected to put up with? Everyone is quick to blame teachers, not knowing what it is they are expected to deal with day in and day out. A teacher can only do so much with what they're given. They need more support. Do you know how many times teachers and staff have called CPS on children only to have nothing happen? From my understanding from what I read from what the great grandfather said his granddaughter and his great-grandson had tried to recieve help multiple times only for nothing to happen.
There were so many things that happened long before this child brought that gun to school. Kids like that boy do deserve help, but if they are that big of a safety issue, which clearly he was, he needed to be somewhere safer, somewhere they could work with him where he didn't put other people's lives at risk. The teacher was the only one shot, but think about the children in that classroom that day. They could have been physically injured, but now they also probably have some mental things they have to work through. We are putting the safety of others at risk because of one child. I'm not saying that child doesn't deserve help and empathy, but I am saying it shouldn't have been up to that teacher to take a bullet to prove it. That child should have had so many other things in place before this kind of thing could happen.
I can think of so many instances when I was working where teachers have literally been attacked by a child and have sent that child to the office only to have that child return ten minutes later. I'm talking about how one teacher had a child's heavy backpack thrown at them, and they later that day ended up in the ER over it, and that child came back to class ten minutes later after a small lecture. Another teacher had a stool thrown at her, and once again the child came back to class. Why are we not taking these issues more seriously?
Do these children deserve compassion and empathy? Yes, absolutely, but there has to be a safer environment for it, with people who have the resources and training to deal with it. We should not be putting them in general education, where the teachers don't have the training to deal with this kind of situation and where the children don't have the same kinds of problems as the children who act this way. We are exposing children to trauma and danger. There has to be a better way to deal with these children that gets them what they need without putting others at risk.
We have such a flawed education system, and everyone is always so quick to blame the teachers and staff without looking at who runs it. Schools don't have the funding they need; teachers and staff are underpaid while being expected to deal with situations that put their lives in danger or cause a ton of stress. Everyone wants to complain about the education system, but no one wants to fund it. Our tax dollars are what pay for the public education system, and few people want to pay for it. If you think they are being unwise with tax dollars and that's your main issue, then go to meetings, vote the way you need to vote, and get involved, but don't take away funding where it's needed. Find the resources to make sure it does go where it's needed.
That little boy deserved to have a better life, and that teacher deserved to be safe at work, and neither one got what they deserved. There needs to be more done to prevent these things from happening. It starts at home with our own kids and teaching them right from wrong; it starts with us teaching children accountability and watching what we are exposing them to. From there, it is up to the other adults to step up when they see something is wrong. It requires CPS to do their jobs; it starts with the higher-ups in the school district doing a better job. Principals need to do their jobs by making sure kids are getting the care they need, by not allowing children who are acting out and are being dangerous to walk back into a classroom they just terrorized. Parents need to take accountability for what their children are being exposed to at home, and if their children aren't safe at home, they definitely aren't safe in school with other children. We need to do better to help the kids who need help while not putting others in danger.
3 people like this
3 responses
@AmbiePam (130904)
• United States
10 Oct
Public schools don’t seem to be required to expel children unless they literally shoot someone. There do need to be schools specifically for troubled children, but those schools also need to be given more power than just to wage a finger at a child and say shame shame, I know your name! They’re toothless right now. And while public schools are underfunded, I think also some funds are being misused. Obviously, not by teachers; that’s impossible.
Here, we don’t hear complaints about teachers not making students mind; their power has been taken away. We know their hands are tied. We’re more likely to hear annoyance about what’s being taught or the teacher’s incompetence to teach it (generally a complain in older classes). If only that were all teachers had to worry about.
It’s too bad you don’t have to pass some kind of test to have children.
1 person likes this
@sissy15 (13543)
• United States
11 Oct
It looks like they really can't expel kids. I know our school won't expel them at the elementary level. We aren't even allowed to hold children back more than one year. We have 5th graders who read at a first-grade level because we don't have the resources to help them the way they need, and they will get passed through the system, or they'll drop out. We had a better system a couple of years ago, but some things had to go when they cut more funding.
Parents have too much power in a lot of cases when it comes to schools. I agree that in a lot of cases the parents should have the power, but not when it comes to sending their problem children to a public school. We have a school that will take more difficult children, but if the parents refuse to send them, then they will continue dealing with them in our regular public schools. The parents need to be told flat out that if their child can't behave here, they HAVE to go to the alternate school for their behavior, or they can be home-taught. I don't understand why we are allowing these behaviors in school because the parents have decided their child belongs in that school when it's obvious the child can't behave there. Why are we not able to put our foot down and say if they can't act right, they can't be here? We don't have the resources or funding to be able to deal with these kids, and it's not fair to the kids who are following directions and are behaving to have to deal with those behaviors in the classroom. I am all for inclusion and allowing kids with physical and mental disabilities in a general education classroom, but no one should be forced to tolerate physical abuse in the name of inclusion. Those kids need to go to a school that can better handle them who have the training and resources to help them.
I agree that funding is not always spent in the best ways, but there are ways to deal with that. They have board meetings that everyone can go to. There are ways to get your point across without cutting much-needed funding that goes directly to programs and staff wages. The only people making money while working in a school are the higher-ups. The teachers and regular staff are living off of peanuts while the people who make the decisions that no one even seems to agree with get paid the big bucks. They make decisions about classrooms they've either never been in or haven't been in for years and then wonder why no one agrees with them. I could go on about this for days. It's frustrating, and I wish more could be done. I think community members need to come together and try to fix the issues, but no one ever agrees when it comes to voting.
1 person likes this
@AmbiePam (130904)
• United States
11 Oct
@sissy15 You know, you reminded me of a teacher I had at my private Christian school. They paid less than public school teachers (not out of being stingy, they just couldn’t afford bigger salaries), and I asked her why she left a better paying job with better benefits. (Please realize I acknowledge that does not mean public school teachers get paid a lot.) she said at the private school she didn’t have to tolerate unruly students. I didn’t know what she meant because we had what I thought of as unruly students. But those students are NOTHING like unruly students in some public schools. Teachers need combat pay! I had to get older to really grasp what crap they go through!
1 person likes this

@RasmaSandra (101354)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
10 Oct
That kid must have been really badly raised or he has a mental problem which the parents must address, I looked online an apparently this boy is in a mental health facility,
1 person likes this
@sissy15 (13543)
• United States
11 Oct
That would be my guess. I couldn't find anything with more information on his home life, at least nothing that went into detail. He was in a mental health facility for a while, but then his great-grandfather got custody of him, and that's where he currently is.
1 person likes this

@Wrexxo (9399)
•
10 Oct
Your point about the teacher not having to take a bullet to prove a child needs help really hit me. I've seen kids come back to class minutes after hurting someone, and it makes no sense. Schools need real support and the right placements for these kids, not just more pressure on teachers.
1 person likes this




