UFC: Shamrock or Ortiz
By SpUtNiKbOi
@SpUtNiKbOi (302)
Philippines
December 8, 2006 11:51pm CST
Whos the better fighter? For me its Ortiz, he has styles that is very unique and hes very good in fighting.
4 responses
@SpUtNiKbOi (302)
• Philippines
20 Dec 06
hes good . . . but when it comes to ground, hes a bit slow . . .
@madmax2crazy (1569)
• United States
18 Dec 06
ortiz has beaten shamrock time and time again, maybe in his prime 10 years ago shamrock coulda won but he's just not the same fighter he use to be, he's not hungry anymore.
@SpUtNiKbOi (302)
• Philippines
19 Dec 06
SHAMROCK IS TOO OLD FOR ORTIZ . . . HES OUT OF THE LEAGUE . . .
@lossforredwords (3620)
• Philippines
9 Dec 06
ortiz but i still idolized shamrock.
i more likely to enjoy watching old ufc fights.. like gracie, severn and mitchelle.
that octagon ring really brings a new kind of sport that unites the different arts of fighting.
what do you think is the best fighting sport that ufc had?
for me uhmmm.. ju jitsu and mua thai...
@SpUtNiKbOi (302)
• Philippines
9 Dec 06
YEAH, ju jitsu is great. it is design for street fighting. jujitsu mixed with judo is the best . . .
@bertus_magnus (329)
• Philippines
18 Dec 06
considering the present condition (and age) of the two fighters, i would have to say ortiz (not to mention that ortiz already beat shamrock twice). ortiz is in his prime, and shamrock, well, is already in his twilight.
if ortiz were to fight shamrock in his prime, then it's anybody's guess.
