usa must be contained !

Tweet

Osama Bin Laden Successfully Re-elects George W. The United States of America deserves another 4 years of George W., a liar cheat and something of a man who has no morals and decidedly callous to boot. I have prayed that George W. Will gets elected and I believe that the sudden appearance of good ole Osama clinched George W.? re-election. Another 4 wonderful years of the stumbling and staggering like a drunk through a foreign policy of guesses and misses. That has been the sum of the achievements of the Presidency of George W. a bundle of guesses and misses. It makes me sick to hear Tony Blair repeatedly mouths nonsense, that Bush? re-election vindicates the Bush Administration? war against terror. Here again he repeats the same nonsense that the illegal and brutal invasion of Iraq equates with the war on terrorism. An absolute pack of nonsense. The war against Iraq has nothing to do with terrorism, because good ole Saddam is a legitimate President of Iraq and Iraq is a UN member state. The Aggression against Iraq cannot be justified on any grounds that Tony Blair has tried to vindicate the Coalition of the willing. The reasons that have been put forward by Bush, Blair and John Howard have been discredited. They have not been able all this time to justify the invasion in breach of the UN Charter; and now after the election of Bush we again hear that same nonsense. The world is not the USA alone, and most of the world community judge the coalition of the willing the ?ggressors?who breached the UN Charter in the war in Iraq. It is incredible to observe that in spite of the open and repeated revelation that the reasons given by the US. Britain and Australia as the reasons justifying the invasion of Iraq, not more than one or two members of the UN have voiced opposition to the destruction of Iraq and yet these few Anglos. Bush Tony Blair and John Howard still mouths lies and are shameless for the injustice that they perpetrated to the Iraqi people. What is more disgraceful and meaningless is the fact that having exposed the lies that these few miscreants led the world community to believe, the United Nations have made any attempts to correct the injustice that had been brought on the Iraqi people. Good ole Saddam is still alive and his whole government are still been detained for ?AR CRIMES? how can this be justifiable. What is more disgraceful is that countries like Japan and South Korea still send troops to Iraq as if it is a just and right thing to do. Just last night I saw an episode of Law and Order. It is a story of an innocent man who was sent to the electric chair for a crime he did not commit. The innocent man came on the scene after the crime was committed and this was witnessed by a 5 year old daughter of the victims, but she was prevented by her uncle from telling this to the police, because he just wants the innocent to die although he knew that the prisoner was innocent. This story just drove to rage when I compare it to the injustice that is perpetrated in Iraq. IS IT RIGHT FOR THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ TO STILL CONTINUE TO SUFFER, KNOWING THAT WE DO THAT THE ILLEGAL INVASION OF IRAQ WAS TO OBTAIN FOR THE US BASES IN IRAQ FOR THE AMERICANS AND FOR THE AMERICANS TO STEAL IRAQI OIL ? How can the UN justify its very existence, in these circumstances ? Is it right for the USA to invade any member state and not be held to account ? The actions of the USA is so very outrageous and yet the UN has not been questioned for its neglect. Is the ongoing war on terror the real thing ? I do not think so that it is myself. This so called war on terror is a mere ?rojan horse? in the context of the USA? policy of Pre-emptive war. Bush has tried it out in Afghanistan and Iraq, and from my observation Bush will extend the currency of this policy to other Muslim oil producing countries in the Middle East. It is also my reading of the situation in Iraq that the current sad state of affairs in Iraq is within the tolerance level that Bush is willing to take; after all is said and done, who are the victims of this Iraq insurgency ? More than 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died because the Americans wants Iraqi oil for themselves. Look at the issue from the point of view of the probable estimate of the world? remaining oil reserves and it is very clear that the USA wants to hog the last barrel of remaining oil. It is estimated that the world? oil reserves will last for another 40 years. President Bush and his pirates believe that they can have all this remaining oil all for themselves alone. Why are the Americans pointing their grubby fingers at the Iranians that they are on course to produce an ATOMIC BOMB ? This is the same scenario that Bush had started for the invasion of Iraq. It never did matter that the US knew that Saddam was never able to produce anything like the Bomb; all that matters is that the USA has tagged Iraq as producing the bomb. Now the Americans are in Iraq and Iraqi oil are in the hands of the Americans. Possession is 9/10th of the Law. Now we have the USA sticking it to the Iranians that Iran is producing the Atomic Bomb; while the Iranians claim that they are only into nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Why is it the burden of the Iranians to prove that they are not into producing the BOMB; why is it that the Israelis do not have to prove that they DO NOT HAVE THE ATOMIC BOMB ? All the world community knows that Israel already more Atomic Bombs than China has. Why are the Americans not hounding the Israelis to prove that the Israelis do not have the Bomb. All the world knows that the evidence of VUNUNU has exposed Israel as having the Atomic Bomb. Why is it not the case for the Americans to sanctions Israel ? I have written a couple of articles that advocates CHINA TO ACT ON A POLICY THAT COBBLES IN TANDEM A DEMAND FOR ISRAEL TO OPEN THEIR FACILITIES TO UN INSPECTION AS WELL IF THE UN WANTS INSPECTION FOR IRAN; on the basis that what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Every time the US or any other UN member state brings up the issue of UN inspection of nuclear facility for Iran, China will bring up in tandem UN inspection of nuclear facility in Israel and that failure to cobble these two together will attract China? veto. The USA under a Bush second term will be worse than his first term. I believe that Bush will use Iran? nuclear issue as pretext to invade Iran unilaterally if needs be. It is my belief that China? veto will go some way to discourage the US but it will not prevent Bush from going all the way. The ongoing problems that the USA faces in Iraq will not discourage the US from invading Iran with or without UN approval. China need not have any misgivings relating to China? trade relations with Iran. We have entered into a contract for gas with Iran and this is good for China and China will reciprocate by watching out for Iran in their fight for Iranian FREEDOM. China needs to supply Iran with their latest military hardware; and why not the US supplies Taiwan with their latest military hardware. China and Russia ought to realize that the USA wants to control the whole of the Arabian Peninsula for the purposes of HOLDING ALL THE WORLD? REMAINING OIL RESERVES; for this reasons Russia and China have a mutual interest to contain the USA in Arabia. The ARTICLE OF MR QCHEN QICHEN must be read with great interest and studied from all its perspectives.