hey buddy, don't you think that cricket depends on luck as well
January 7, 2007 5:13am CST
i think playing cricket is ok but results depend on luck as well.. bcoz.. most of the time.. its depending on what destiny has written for which team.. for enery particular match.. post ur opinion and experiences.. when destiny changed.. result at last point.. or at any point there is a change in match.. a turning point.. unexpeted.. but occurs.
13 Jan 07
yes that can be said.sometimes it catually depend too much on the luch factor.if you remember aswell prince had a lot of luck in the first test match against the indians and then he never ran out of it.so cricket is a game of uncertanities and that makes it more interesting
13 Jan 07
I think luck is an elemnt in cricket but don't think that entire game depends on it..It's the hard work and the amount of hours you spend practicing that pays on the field...It all depends on the skill level and proficiency you achieve in this field...luck may change the fate of game or two.. but the game is definately not dependent on merely luck..
8 Jan 07
I really think, yes its a big factor look sami and zaheer khan are biggest examples, both have more downs then ups in their carriers but they are really unlucky I have seen most drop chances in indian team for the bowlig of zaheer, and same with pakistan for bowling of sami
7 Jan 07
yeah very much .because you can get out on a real simple delivery and smash a good ball for a six.also in lbw decisions,a plyer caught in front of the stumps plum wont be given out,while at other times ,if the ball is missing the stumps the player would be declared out.its your luck which takes yo through all this.remember what happened to sachin tendulkar in the last innings of the third test.he wasnt out but still had to go to the pavilion .thats the nature of the game.sometimes you get lucky but remember everyday is not a sunday.