Underworld, which one was better 1 or 2?

@sirora (56)
United States
January 14, 2007 8:09pm CST
What will the third one be about? What else do they have to talk about since the very first lycans or vampires are dead..
5 responses
shadowcat_018
@shadowcat_018 (834)
• Philippines
8 Apr 07
i like them both! i like vampire films! is there really a 3rd one? yeah, im gonna look forward to that!
AuthenticPeach
@AuthenticPeach (283)
• United States
19 Feb 07
They were both good in my opinion but I usually am a sucker for the fist one. Theres going to be another one?
bannerbot
@bannerbot (26)
•
15 Jan 07
the truth is far from over with them in all vampire films there are many different first vampires so i recon they will find one
pranaydharmale
@pranaydharmale (138)
• India
5 Feb 07
The Indian Captian !! - Rahul dravid the indian captain is according to me the best player the cricket world has. He is the best batsmen at No. 3 position in world cricket and do accelerates the run-rate when in need in ODI's and gives the Indian team a solid defensive stance as a classic Test Player . He' s simply superb.
I think underworld 1 was better than part 2 the evolution . First part was successful in generating interest in the old and outdated concept of werewolves and vampires. Kate Bekinsale in Part 1 was simply perfect as a vampire . Part 2 lacked in some places but was still a good movie to watch.
Subaru8835
@Subaru8835 (73)
• United States
5 Feb 07
Well the problem can still arise where Celine needs to return to her coven. I feel number 1 was better, than 2 because in the final battle the first ever vampire(name?) and first ever lycan(name?) were defeated too easily by michael and celine.