who is more dangerous Saddam Huessein or George Bush

India
January 19, 2007 7:13am CST
Open up your mind and let me know what you think
2 responses
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
19 Jan 07
Saddam Hussein. Tyrannical dictator who wanted WMDs for terrorist agendas vs. a controversial leader, its easy in my book.
19 Jan 07
Man who wanted nuclear warheads vs the man who sold the technology for them to India, who has so far invaded two countries! It's just as easy in my book.
1 person likes this
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
21 Jan 07
Bush didn't sell nukes to India. A man named AQ Khan developed them (in the 80's) and then sold them to Pakistan as well, then met with both terrorists and Iran to sell them. He currently lives in I think India and is a national hero. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Qadeer_Khan#Development_of_nuclear_weapons Maybe you're referring to the treaty made with India that allowed them to both sign on to the official non-proliferation group (all the responsible owners of nuclear weapons) and trade safer more advanced nuclear energy reactor information? And Saddam invaded two countries as well, Iran in 1980 that resulted in an 8 year war with 1 million casualties and Kuwait in 1980. So what was your point?
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
21 Jan 07
My mistake, AQ Khan I believe was responsible for Pakistans nukes, not Indias. But Indias first nuclear test was done in 1974, so you're still wrong.
@whitefox (1347)
• Italy
21 Jan 07
I think Bush: he as Saddam kills the innocent people without problems but on the contrary of Saddam he says that he will do it in name of the peace in the world while instead it only thinks of his interests.