President Bush gave an excellent State of the Union Message

I am sick of hearing about the "lies" Preisdent Bush told us to get us into the war. Remember every major Intellengence Service in the world said the same thing. How many times did the UN tell Sadam to stop building the weapons or else. President Clinton said he had weapons of mass distruction. Senator Kerry saw the same intellengence and said he had WMD's. Then during the war the UN inspectors critized the Army for not putting enough guards on some storage sites because Sadam had components for WMD stored there. This info was given the Army after the face. Why didn't France, Germany, and Russia not support the war. They were making BILLIONS with the UN's Oil for Food program and selling Sadam weapons instead of food. Wake up and realize that the Media wants the US to lose and will not tell us of the positive things happening over there. For example this past weekend 25 US service men were killed. Every news media reported that. Only a few reported that severla leaders of the insurgance and Al Sadar top aids were captured. Over 400 of his soldierswere killed or captured. We are having more casualities because we are taking the fight to the enemy. What did Japan do when the end of the war was near in WWII? The used suside planes to inflict damage on the Americans. Now the insurgances are using suside bombers - maybe because they are lsoing. Talk to solders who have been over ther. What they see in the news media over here is nothing like what is happening. Remember AP main reported in the Middle East was a media fooicial of Hammas? You mentioned Viet Nam. Remeber this We won every major battle we fought the VC or North Veit Nam troops except one. The battle in the US Media. They caused out defeat over there and they are trying to do it again.

Good response bobmnu - It is well established fact that the media and the Democrats have a major vested interest in the U.S. losing in Iraq. They care not about our country or are future. What they know, and I now see it, is that if President Bush is successful in Iraq, the 2008 election is over. It is rather sick that they would be so obsessed with their desire for political power that they would want our country to suffer shame and humiliation. Yet they will tell you that they are patriotic and loyal citizens. They have put themselves in a position that when President Bush spoke of victory, they merely sat there and scowled.

It's still a meaningless war because Bush was supposed to go after Osama Bin Laden and his posse...instead the moron went after Saddam and his posse. Saddam wasn't behind the 9/11 attacks. Bin Laden WAS THE MASTERMIND and he's still out there laughing it off. I'd be singing a different tune if Bush had gone after the REAL responsibles for the attacks.

do you think so

Good response, bobmnu - I agree that our forces (risking their lives for our freedom) should not have their hands tied. The sooner we get in and get the job done, the sooner people of all types stop being killed. Of course, the goal here is not perfect peace and harmony. We will not be able to make the Iraqi people love each other.

For those Democrats who did not want to listen to the speech, at least there was good entertainment in the background: http://www.blogfeast.net/djbtol/nancy_pelosi_we_did_not_know#new

Muslim Barack Hussein Osama would be such a terrific leader in the war against terror. Being trained as a youth to hate the infidels, he would open the door for any terrorists with a pretty smile.

Proud to be an American, and not a Democrat. Thanks for your response.

Thanks for your response. You are wrong, but that's OK.

what are you going to say when thous booms are over hear in stead of over thire And you going to say it is bush fault for not stopping them when he had the chances I think that we have to stop them I don't want a nother 9-11 do you if we cut and run like you say them they well be booming your famly woud you like that

Thanks for your response. You can be confident that fighting the terrorists and successfully avoiding another 9/11 attack is not meaningless.

Thanks for your comment.

If you say the war was not necessary, then you have forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. This is amazing. The decision to go into Iraq was fully endorsed by the Democrats, who had the same information as President Bush. We either fight the terrorists over there, or we fight them here. It is one or the other. Apparently you prefer to have this war in your town. Thanks for responding.

Well said!!!! I'm giving you a standing ovation right now!!! At least there are some that still think logically.

Thank you.. Well someone has to say it and I got to tell ya, I sure did not vote Bush in office.

Why does cut and run in VietNam become an acceptable standard for the U.S. Our soldiers have been trained to when, and you want to tell them tha Democratic politics is reasons enough for them to lose. That is crazy. The Democrats were more than willing to send the troops to Iraq, and as soon as it does not fit their poltical agenda, they arre willing to cut off the funding. That is sick, and certainly not American.

The Democrats are fully invested in the U.S. quitting and/or losing the war. That is the extent of their love for America. They won the election by stirring up hatred for President Bush, and that is all. There was no platform, no intelligent discussion and certainly no mandate from the people. The American public is obviously not able to sort through all the lies and find the truth. The only thing the Democrats know now is that if Bush succeeds, their quest for power is over. Thanks for yor response.

I love your comment!!!

The democrats are all about image and empty symbolism. President Bush, against major opposition, is still committed to doing right by the USA. Hope he continues! Thanks for your response.