California wants to ban light bulbs?

@estherlou (5015)
United States
January 31, 2007 11:08pm CST
What? a california lawmaker wants to ban light bulbs to help energy use and prevent greenhouse gases which is supposedly causing global warming. Even if it is a good idea, how can they expect a company to not sell their product, or make people buy a certain product over another one?
7 people like this
13 responses
@villageanne (8553)
• United States
1 Feb 07
I started to say "what will they think of next to ban?" but I am afraid to ask that question. I just wish they would enforce the laws we already have instead of sitting around making up more rules!
2 people like this
@TiareF (241)
• United States
2 Feb 07
I'm going to have to agree with you on this one, too many laws that already are not being enforced. The corkscrew light bulbs are also supposed to last a whole lot longer than the others, but I don't know if that makes them worth the price that they have on them. They just have to keep adding more so that we have something else to worry about.
@sedel1027 (17846)
• Cupertino, California
1 Feb 07
So would you only be able to use a certian brand of light blubls? Like the corkscrew looking ones that are suppose to be very safe? When my parents bought their house all of the lights were that kind of bulb. Even though they are efficent my momchanged them out because they made everything look yellow.
2 people like this
@estherlou (5015)
• United States
1 Feb 07
I forgot to put in the link to the article! Yes, those are the ones. Hmmm...I'd like to save energy, but don't want everything to look yellowish... http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/1/31/74949.shtml?s=us
@freesoul (3021)
• Egypt
2 Feb 07
This is a little bit extreme to say the least .. why can't governments do anything about big companies that pollute the environment and release enormous amount of gases and smoke in the air instead?.
2 people like this
@Melizzy (1381)
• United States
2 Feb 07
First mistake, you got your story from the right wing NewsMax. Second mistake, have you EVER lived in California and had to deal with smog (I know that annoying little thing called GLOBAL WARMING just won't go away) and horrible breathing conditions? And finely, do you even grasp the concept of what they are really saying? You can't buy ferrets, ostrich skin items in California, so why not certain types of light bulbs? I lived in LA for 6 years. It's not that quaint little of 200k you live in, but with every single car and all the crap they emit, every bit helps. Have you ever been in a rolling blackout? There are super energy efficient light bulbs to be had. Unless you've lived through blackouts, meaning the power is CUT and no air in the middle of the day when it's 115 degrees, don't be so quick to judge.
@estherlou (5015)
• United States
4 Feb 07
Wow! I wasn't intending to judge, just surprised. And man oh man...did I push your buttons. That is why I was asking about it. I haven't lived in California and I haven't seen your smog, but it just seemed strange to tell people what product to use.
@hopefoo (1145)
• Malaysia
2 Feb 07
That's just nuts. I don't think anyone can ban the lightbulb totally. Did they say what kinda lightbulbs? The more traditional kind or even those phillips energy saving kinds too? I hope they don't ban those. I love those. They're bright and they save on costs.
2 people like this
@Fluplup (555)
• United States
2 Feb 07
I agree with you! The movie about a global warning, did you see that? It was very interesting to watch former Vice President AL Gore presents an eye opening and compelling view of the future of our planet.
2 people like this
@rainbow (6761)
1 Feb 07
Would you be forced to used energy saving bulbs or candles? It doesn't make a lot of sense, people are gradually changing to more energy efficient bulbs, why not just give the manufacturors incentives to make a healthier bulb. A law is rather extreme. I found out hte oher week that the silver backed reflector spotlight bulbs use less energy than just plain and I had thought they used more, whichmade me feel better about tne kitchen and our bedrooms. Apparently is you kep your buls dust free they use less engery too.
1 person likes this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
2 Feb 07
This is a perfect example of someone wishing to be seen to be doing the right thing, rather than actually trying to help the situation. I agree that a small benefit to the environment would be involved, but this is hardly going to make a significant difference if the person concerned is driving around in a large limousine powered by an internal combustion engine.
1 person likes this
@Lydia1901 (16351)
• United States
20 Mar 07
Well, I haven't heard this one before. I don't think that will last for very long. People like to use light bulbs even if they don't know it just yet.
1 person likes this
• United States
2 Feb 07
And just what are they substituting in place of the bulbs...SS
1 person likes this
@Willowlady (10657)
• United States
1 Feb 07
Our freedoms are being tread on. If there is a product legislated into required purchase then it should be really inexpensive. So that all peoples can afford to buy it. Light bulbs can be a step however there are more other things that could be given this kind of attention. Let us hope that they are going that at this very moment!
1 person likes this
@hktambia (102)
• India
2 Feb 07
don't worry, let it happen.
1 Feb 07
Can't they just use energy saving ones instead? Perhaps they can tax the ones that are worse for the environment and then subsidise the more energy efficient ones thus swaying the consumers to buy them as they are cheaper.
1 person likes this