Who is Terrorist??
February 3, 2007 6:12pm CST
George W Bush or Osama Bin Laden?
5 Feb 07
of course its osama bin laden. u cannot compare a polished politician/president with a terrorist whose prime reason is to destroy mankiind and rule the world and do partiality towards only the muslim community!!!
6 Feb 07
Of course Osama? Do U know, even 2day NO NEWS channel can portray him as the Criminal.. they all has to say PRIME SUSPECT...until this day... There is no solid Proof or Evidence whatsoever to Blame him. even if we believe hypothetically that He had done that 9/11 crime, YET Do u believe this gives the RIGHT to the world's Most advanced country [USA] to Kill or Destroy a poor under developed Nation? is this Justified? If U r powerful and if U have solid evidence against a man, go and catch him, punish him, Hang him...WHO gives the authority to DESTROY a Poor Nation????? Bush had to say, Saddam has Chemical Weapon ... did he found any weapon ???NO...No matter how cruel saddam could be... what difference left in Saddam and Bush??? Honestly Nothing
7 Feb 07
my other ideas? excuse me... u said indeed we found chemical weapons: Oh thats interesting, America who did the investigation had not found anything; its a well known fact to the world, Now u went to Iraq and U found chemical mass destructive weapons: Shocking NEWS all tat Bush had to say is he didnt found the weapon, but he is liberating Iraq... and regarding the claims that Osama accepted several times? when? where? who saw? did u? or your Bush said in ur dream... wakeup dude. everytime there is election in hand, BUSH came up with TAPE, where Osama speaking... from where he finds? how can we believe? its all propaganda... Media Undercover GAME
• United States
4 Feb 07
Considering I don't have all the facts before me, and only information I've derived from TV News and newspapers, it is hard for me to judge for certain who the real terrorists are. I don't know these people personally,all I know about them is what I've heard through the media news, which I consider biased in many ways as it is. However, if I'm to make a judgement on what I've heard and seen so far, I'd say both of them are contributing to a good amount of pain and suffering to alot of people in both their countries that they live in, in the name of whatever they believe in. So I believe that in some ways, they are both terrorists. And they're not the only ones, there seem to be a number of leaders, in different countries now, that are ruling their countries in ways that cause a great deal of suffering for their peoples. The world is full of terrorists it seems nowadays. What I want to know, are they any leaders, presisdents, kings, rulers...whatever, that are NOT terrorists out there any more?
• United States
4 Feb 07
Bush wasn't much better I mean did we even find any of these so called weapons? Osama has been missing for what 4 years now and hasn't sent us any little presents. I'm quite sure Bush invaded their country. Yes he's improving it, but did they want us to do that?