City or Suburbs, which is best?

I like having both. I live very close to NYC (a 15-minute bus ride, without traffic) but live in a small city that has its own restaurants, shopping, and arts. I don't think I'd want to live in NYC; it's too crowded and expensive. So where I live is perfect for me--close enough to the city to go in whenever I want, but I can get out whenever I want.

My eldest son lived in the centre of London for 12 years, at International Hall, near Trafalgar Square. He loved it there. I certainly wouldn't like it in the centre of a city, although where that son is now is good for visits. He is living on the 24th floor of an inner city apartment block, with balconies giving a panoramic wide view over the river and bridges and city buildings. It is quiet and peaceful there and yet right in the city. I visit Sydney a few times a year and stay in the suburbs. I think living in the suburbs is really no different from living in a major town and shopping is pretty much the same everywhere. Of course, for the younger people, they are closer to major entertainments. We were sugar cane farmers until we retired but we were only a 20 minute drive from a major town. I enjoyed the rural life. Now we are close to the centre of a major town and I do like the convenience of being able to duck into town when necessary - and even when not necessary. I guess preference really depends on age and lifestyle. The young might want to be at the hub of entertainment. The young family might prefer a rural atmosphere, while the aging want the convenience of shopping and assistance. I am happy where I am. Thanks for a good discussion.

Hi Carl, nice to see you again. I think the suburbs are best. its so peaceful and quit. You get to enjoy nature and all its beauty. The city has so much traffic and different people noises it bothers me.