Plese Help me in Book 5 and Book 6, I am so confused!

@vkbllm (474)
India
February 17, 2007 7:07am CST
Hey Guy and Girls plese help me out! Well I just finished Book 5 and started book 6. But the book 6 is so confusing to me. Let me ask you:- In book 5 Dudely is dead and Sirius is alive, whereas in Book 6 The dudely is alive and sirius is dead? How?? We have read an elaborate detail of Dudely's funeral in Book 5, havent we? How come he is alive? And than there are refrence of a teacher called Umbridge in book 6 where as there was no such person in previous book. And in Book 5 Draco Malfoy was abandned by his mother, because he traited his father Luscious Malfoy. But in book 6 He is showed shopping with his mother at leaky cauldron! There is also refrence in book 6, that some thing went wrong in the premises of Ministry of magic, hence sirius is killed, but its detail is not presnt in Book 5 nor in Book 6! Whats wrong, please clear me!
1 person likes this
8 responses
• India
17 Feb 07
Please take my advise seriously. You need to read all the six parts once again thoroughly. Thanks
1 person likes this
@vkbllm (474)
• India
17 Feb 07
Oh c'mon nishant! I have all six parts ready in my hand. And all books are just fresh in my mind because I am reading them in rapid succession. All 5 books were fresh, but this Book 6, I think there are some missing links in it!
@joy358 (491)
• Philippines
21 Feb 07
I think you've been reading the wrong books. I also have e-books of all Harry Potter books and they're exactly the same as the printed version. Did you buy yours? If you did you should probably ask for a refund coz its obvious you've been scammed.
@sreedhar (576)
• India
18 Feb 07
There are a lot of different versions of harry potter on the net. Dont trust them all, they can mislead you by presenting a totally different story. For your information i have read many different ebooks saying that they are harry potters 7 book. But all of them presented a differeent story.
1 person likes this
@pearl1003 (670)
• Philippines
17 Feb 07
Hey, maybe, you should read the books again. Dudley didn't die, okay? And Draco wasn't abandoned by his mother, neither betrayed his father. The Ministry of Magic already had flaws in the earlier books, and I think in Book 5, it was obvious. Umbridge is part of Book 5 so we'll be seeing her in the 5th film of Harry Potter...What's wrong? I think there's something wrong with your memory... Let's read the book again... I'm currently at the 1st chapter of the 5th book.
@vkbllm (474)
• India
18 Feb 07
there is nothing wrong in my memory! But I think I am fooled some how, all this I read in an eversion., Ofcourse its not leagal, but it was eversion.
• Philippines
21 Feb 07
What? You read a wrong copy?? Ah, that's why you're so confused. Whoever wrote that version you've read is, let's say, stupid for confusing you??!! hahaha... Harry has no pet named Sandy... Anyway, my advice is, go get original copies. It's not too late to start reading the books now. Happy Reading! :)
@abby_abz (155)
• Philippines
20 Feb 07
I think you read the fan-fic e-book or Harry Potter. You read the right Book six but the book 5 was not the right one J.K Rowling wrote. I suggest you purchase the book 5 instead. ^_^
• United States
18 Feb 07
There are new characters in every book - they couldn't introduce all the characters in the first book! I don't know what happened in your copy of Book 5, but it sounds WAY different than mine!
@emeraldisle (13145)
• United States
17 Feb 07
Well not sure what book 5 you are reading but sounds like something is messed up. It sounds like you got a hold of some fan fiction or something else but somewhere or another things aren't right. Umbridge was all through book 5 and Dudely didn't die. None of the rest you said about 5 is right.
@CherylPH (32)
• United States
17 Feb 07
I'm not sure what format you are reading these books, but if they are e-books, know that Jo (JKRowling) did NOT NOT NOT publish any Harry Potter books in that form. Read only the printed, published versions, anything else has probably been fudged with.