Do you think Bush will attack Iran???
By insanegoob
@insanegoob (72)
India
February 19, 2007 10:46am CST
I really would hate to see iran being the next victim of what can only be called as the tyranny that is being created by Bush everywhere....i cant believe the fact that Bush went to war against Iraq for selfish reasons and now according to reports he is strategically placed to invade Iran too now...i mean I am disgusted with this monster who calls him self the leader of the free world....I would really hate to see another war where innocent people are the victims...
1 person likes this
4 responses
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
19 Feb 07
Tyranny? You want tyranny look at Iran. Are you aware of what Iran is doing right now and in the recent past? Are you aware that half of the world wants action, from embargos to force to diplomacy, against Iran because they are so dangerous and defiant?
What personal gain has George Bush made from Iraq?
1 person likes this
@IrishEddie (18)
• Ireland
19 Feb 07
Hi again,
The gain has been personal in the fact that Bush owns major shares in some oil companies.
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
19 Feb 07
As well as how the oil contracts for Iraqi oil are illegal?
1 person likes this
@IrishEddie (18)
• Ireland
19 Feb 07
The fact is that the guy is right and if they can possibly get away with it for the third time America will invade a sovereign nation.
Iran are now becoming a threat to the security of the oil that America has just secured in Iraq and this is the sole reason they will be invaded.
The issue in all these wars has not been that America are saving a poor country from their tyrannical rulers , if they wanted to do that Indonesia would be a good place to start , however Indonesia have no oil and have what i believe is about the fifth largest army in the world so the fight wouldnt be worth it.
Why dont they save Colombia or Ecuador or some of the countries right on Americas doorstep?
Because they have no natural resources required by the American Imperialists.
1 person likes this
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
20 Feb 07
None of those countries have or worked to develop nuclear weapons or other WMD and none of those countries have threatened the US and Israel as well as ignored international rules on how they should be behaving...
Could that be the possible difference too?
1 person likes this
@insanegoob (72)
• India
20 Feb 07
I dont understand...you speak about international rules and WMDs....have you looked at the international laws and seen how unfair they are.....it clearly asks all the other so called third world countries of the world never to build either nuclear weapons or WMDs however it has no restrictions against countries like the US, UK, Russia and others from possessing the same....so if a world war were to start right now they expect us to go hiding in our little holes while they blast us to hell right cos we can never defend with the kind of weapons we have got....
@IrishEddie (18)
• Ireland
20 Feb 07
WMDS - excuse me , neither did Afghanistan or Iraq
1 person likes this
@andrisetia (73)
• Indonesia
20 Feb 07
yes he will, its run on his blood
blood of war...
1 person likes this
@mortein869 (51)
• Pakistan
21 Feb 07
yes i too.i mean dis man thnx the whole world is his personal property!!!or is he trying himself to portray as a grt reformist for world peace.well mr.bush aggression iz nvr the right option to opt nd ur blunders will soon cause u nd ur nation heavy penalties...sorry if some american feel dis.
1 person likes this
