Why bother with reading?

March 2, 2007 5:21pm CST
Have you ever wished you could join in a discussion about a book but simply can't be bothered to read it? There is an answer, the trick to convincing people you know what you are talking about is simple, all you have to do is have a vague idea of the storyline and then ensure that whatever you argue you do so with clarity and conviction. This actually works read the BBC article who will explain more. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6411449.stm
2 people like this
7 responses
@nowment (1757)
• United States
3 Mar 07
Why bother with reading? By reading you do actually know the subject rather then bluffing your way through it. Reading is entertaining, educational, and can be an adventure. For something to have real meaning and purpose for us, we have to have some level of genuine understanding, all else is just kind of superficial. Most real readers are readers for one important reason, the joy of it. When you think back to the fact that there was a time when most people could not read or write, it was those in power who could. Yet even those who had power were limited when they themselves could not read. Just as a wealthy man can lose it all if he doesn't have enough basic math skills to check out his own accounts, even if he does have a good accountant. There are stories of embezzlement all the time. There were those who lost much because people couldn't understand what they were reading, or signing, this is why you bother with reading. For your own self protection. For your own enjoyment. For your own learning and development. I can understand about talking a good game, and even bluffing your way but that won't hold up for long, eventually you can get caught, especially by someone who may be more knowledgable than you. example two men are arguing, one feels morally superior, he is a bible thumper, he knows what god wants, and he is not afraid to tell us, during the course of the arguement he shouts, Jesus said to worship me. Matthew Well the second man who instead of claiming to know the bible does know the bible and responds. Matthew 4:10 Jesus said to him, Go away satan for it is written you are to worship the lord your god and serve only him. The second man was able to counter any arguement the religous bigot had because he had actually read the bible and could counter what was said and back it up. The religous zealot could only argue with dogma, and what he thought was in the bible but did not know for sure. The same can be said for any discussion or book debate. This is why bother reading.
1 person likes this
3 Mar 07
Good answer. But still this technique of bluffing would have been useful when at school and having to read Shakespear, great writer and his plays are good but reading it is the most difficult and boring thing in the world. I just want to read for the fun of it
2 people like this
@nowment (1757)
• United States
5 Mar 07
Now there you have me, I like to read for fun, it is hard to get through shakespear in highschool because of the language style, of his era. Did you ever see the movie renessance man with danny de vito? I was lucky I had a teacher who taught shakespear like he did in the movie. But the first teacher that tried to ram it down our throats dang it almost made me not want to read anything at all. LOL Some teachers are gifted some do by rout, unfortunately in the latter case. And there was more than one book I wouldn't have minded having this technique for in those days. Because the have to read stuff took away from my read for pleasure time.
1 person likes this
@msqtech (15074)
• United States
30 Mar 07
Deception is the fools game. Only the fool is hurt.
• United States
6 Mar 07
But you will never know what you may have missed if you never read the book. I did the same thing in school now that I am older I realized that reading is a great thing. It can make you laugh, cry and take you places unknown.
1 person likes this
@kokopelli (4842)
• United States
4 Mar 07
if it's not a real or indepth discussion like just mentioning something in passing, or giving an idea of what the book is all about, bluffing would work. otherwise, it's not wise to pretend you know what you're talkin about and be embarrassed when caught later, hehe. this works the same about movies. one can just read short reviews of the film and he can go ahead and indulge in discussions of it. i love reading books, next to watching movies, that's why i appreciate people's suggestions of good ones. thanks for the link anyway, that would work for students who rarely have time to sit down and really read. i'm sure my son could use those tips :)
@bigstret (484)
4 Mar 07
Thats a great way of bluffing people lol I will have to remember this link Thanks
@LittleMel (8742)
• Canada
3 Mar 07
I responded to many discussions just by mere knowledge of what I heard and read here and there, but I'm not a book reader. I usually just do a search with specific keyword and read whatever article there is. But if you are talking about a book discussion, no I'm not really into books.
1 person likes this
@BrettG (50)
• United States
2 Mar 07
I've done this before with school reports, or rather, 'used' to until I graduated. I'd say I was rather good at it seeing as how I always managed to make higher that a 'C' lol. I read small pieces in the book and just kind of filled in the rest. Reading the summary mainly gives you the best idea.
1 person likes this
@msqtech (15074)
• United States
30 Mar 07
Why would you want to be so deceptive? What purpose could it serve and how much risk is it to your respect. I wouldn't want to falsely present myself.