metro sexuals
By BourderHouse
@BourderHouse (749)
Philippines
2 responses
@aries_0325 (3060)
• Philippines
8 Mar 07
Thus the true dilemma of metrosexuality and why many men won't jump into it, or at least not fully.
I'm all for looking better, but I can tell what actually can help and what really is a waste, at least in my eyes.
Some people say the right set of clothes and shoes can make a difference. But they don't have to cost 150 $ a piece either.
Some people say esthetic care (i.e. facials, manicures/pedicures, hair removal and the other 6 of 9 yards) can make that difference.
Some people say cosmetics can make that difference too.
And others might say the general attitude of themselves or how they interact with others would change.
If I had to make these choices, clothes = yes; esthetics = somewhat reluctant, depends; cosmetics = NO. (For me the biggest turn-off are vegetarians with goops of make-up. Due to the fact that a lot of cosmetic products kill animals just for odor glands, not even for their meat. Vegetarians and make-up are #2 and #3) --- And my attitude would change and evolve with time to something more confdident in myself, not afraid to do or say anything. I think I hit that point but the next day I realize I need to do twice as much to make it. Becoming a metro- wouldn't do that, it may accelerate the process though :P
Money is a factor. I will never lose money in order to maintain an ideal even I don't fully view. And most metrosexuals I have seen or heard about have short hair. That is one thing I will never surrender on the path to climax outer, inner and spiritual handsomeness/bliss. It will hopefully complement it :P
Whatever I experiment, it will not be eclipsed by the capitalistic view, nor will it be directly copied on some magazine's ideal of the perfect man. And the sidenote brought by Sgt. Wang : If I don't like it, I don't do it. It's fairly simple

