Football or cricket

I think both games are very intersting.

I prefer football but I dont really know cricket.

Both games are good football u need to wait for a maximum of 2 hors for the net result but in cricket u need to wait for arounf 9 hrs the intrest quotient is much more in cricked that in Football but the draw back is football is more widespread that cricket So populatity ofd football is more but i prefer cricket

Football is a more popular and interesting game, the games in only 90mins with 2 half of 45 mins. Cricket take a long time to determine the result. One day or over 5 days, you need to have the time and the patient to wait for the outcome of the result.

Football because there are no cricket in France ^^

i would go with cricket simply bcoz its just a facinating and exciting game for keen followers

I prefer football to cricket. For starters football matches are lot shorter than cricket match in which you end up wasting the whole day. Next up, there seems to be more action in a dull football match than an exciting cricket match. But cricket is more a game of perseverance and gives both team ample opportunities to come back and in that way is also quite exciting. Cheers! Ram

i think both game are good. the only difference is that in football we dont have to wait much for the result. ofcource we cant say till the end that who will win , in both the games. but as indian i think here people prefer football only during WORLD-CUP, where as cricket is like ever green. as far as i concern i like both ,but cricket slightly more.

personally i find football more interesting, cricket feels a bit too slow for me, and sometimes gets a bit boring when they play test matches that may last a few days - i tend to loose interest