Loved and Lost?

March 15, 2007 2:37am CST
Loved and Lost? Is there any truth to the clinch "Better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?".
1 person likes this
2 responses
• China
15 Mar 07
I would have to choose NEVER TO HAVE LOVED AT ALL. Why? Coz to have loved and lost it would HURT SoOoOo Much!!!! The pain was just so bad that i cant find the words to describe it. There would be times when I cried myself out in my room for no particular reason. Why would you want to hurt yourself just to experience sumthing exciting like love? I would prefer to live my life with no pain though i wouldnt experience love.
@aries_0325 (3060)
• Philippines
15 Mar 07
I'm going to have to go with "to never have loved at all". Love is a positive.........lost is an equal if not greater negative. to have never loved at all is neither a positive or a negative. You never gained anything.......but you never lost anything either. analogy: Is it better to win 1million dollars and lose it all..........or to never have won it at all. I'm going with the second one. There is nothing lost because you don't know what you're missing...........whereas the first one you've not only lost everything you gained but you also lost more.........disappointment added on top of the loss of the original gain.