Credibility of large proofs of earnings, or more beleivable ammounts.
By drkress
@drkress (25)
United States
March 23, 2007 2:09pm CST
It it more credible to see a large ammount of money that someone has made or a smaller ammount, like say 20 to 30 dollars a week as opposed to like 1200 or so. I can beleive a lot easyer if someone has a realistic proof of gain than some crazy ammount, that ill never be able to earn. What catched your eye in a money making prospect?
1 person likes this
2 responses
@tess1960 (2385)
• United States
23 Mar 07
I think smaller aounts are more believable. The people that make largest sums usually have no life or are doing it 24/7 because the have insomnia, or they have people working for them umder there user name.
Just my opinion!
i just want an extra $100.00 per month for bills.
@ShadowWalker (969)
• United States
23 Mar 07
If I made a $100.00 on her I'd freak. As far as large amounts of money people claim to have made. I want valid proof that did not just their word that they did. Anyone can say anything but that doesn't make so. Show me proof then I'll believe you.
@mbizmom (237)
• United States
7 Apr 07
It's not realistic to assume you're going to make thousands a month from any website so I would automatically write that program off if somebody tried to tell me you could. However, if someone told me I could make an extra 60 a month by reading e-mails, taking surveys, etc., I would be more likely to believe that and give it a try. Get rich schemes are usually just that, schemes.
