Legislating Comfort? The Nanny State run amok!

Tweet

It all started way back when, when city officials decided to ban smoking in public places. Now, I think smoking is about as stupid as munching on Paint Chips and Salsa, but I'm not one to whine for a ban on something simply because I think it's stupid. The city officials decided that no owner of a privatly owned business should have the right to decide what legal products and services they want to allow on their private property. In short, they stripped the owners of their legal rights. There is a bill in the Wisconsin legislature that would impose a $200 fine on anyone who made woman feel uncomfortable while nursing her baby in public. Now, I am all for nursing, I agree that it is the most healthy way to feed a baby. I don't think a mother should have to sit on a public toilet to feed her baby, nor do I think that she should have to stay home for the duration of the time she feels it important to nurse her baby. On the other hand, it is the job of the owners and managers of businesses to decide the comfort standards of their establishment, not the government. If the owner/manager feels it is in the best interests of the business to allow nursing then by all means, they should allow it. On the other hand, if they feel that a nursing mother would detract from the esthetics and atmosphere of their business, then they should have every right to ask mothers to do that somewhere else. In turn the mother and those with her have every right to choose not to frequent that business anymore. They even have the right to tell all their friends and family about how horrible a place is. Since when is comfort the role of any level of government? How are nursing mothers any more entitled to comfort as those around her? This bill would impose a fine for making her uncomfortable, yet she doesn't seem to care about the comfort of those around her.