would you rather be eaten by ants or lions?

@soadnot (1606)
Canada
March 29, 2007 12:45pm CST
slowly and painfully or amazing painfuly
4 people like this
3 responses
@add_im (2712)
• Philippines
13 May 07
Lol, I would rather chose eating them raw :-) Just kidding... Well seriously, I will not let both of them to eat me, not at all. That's too painful if it does happen for real in a person, but not so much though with an ant. :-)
@academic2 (7009)
• Uganda
28 Apr 07
Wao! I saw a movie on the invasion of ants, my God, it was a very painful way to die, it took just 20 minutes and a full man was reduced to boes by about 1 million ants-No I rather invite a lion to devour me quickly and less painfully!
@seamonkey (1981)
• Ireland
29 Mar 07
I found this at National Geographic news: ""Man eaters have historically been considered aberrant or exceptional," said study co-author Julian Kerbis Peterhans, an adjunct curator of mammals at The Field Museum and an associate professor at Roosevelt University in Chicago, Illinois. "In fact they are carnivores that have always included primates [such as humans] as part of their diets," he said. Having been to Six Flags in Vallejo and seen this big boys close up, and heard their handlers talk about how they have to raise them from cubs or be slowly exposed to them for three years before they are accepted, I'm not really surprised. Personlly, having seen the size of their paws, claws, and teeth, would really prefer to have it over qwuickly. Then again, if you have ever owned a cat, and seen how they play with birds and mice, maybe it wouldn't be that quick. It'd have to be quicker then the ants though, so I'd go with, 'amazing painfully' and hope it would also be amazingly quick. I would rather be eaten by a lion.