For the Love of Man

Philippines
April 3, 2007 8:57am CST
I've been reading "The Call of the Wild" over and over. The first time I read it, I cried a river. John Thornton is simply a lonely man in need of love which Buck the dog eagerly shares. Buck saved John from drowning, from the notorious drunk and brought glory and money to his master. It was a good start, but the ending deflated my hopes for a happy ending. John and his two partners struck the gold mine, but they got killed by the Indians. Buck was having some sort of a reunion with his own kind, and it was too late to save his beloved master. He killed the leader and warriors of the tribe, and there was nothing and no one holding him back from heeding the Call of the Wild. If you were the editor of the book, would you rather that John and his partners didn't die so they could enjoy the sweet and yellow fruit of their hard labor?
3 people like this
4 responses
@sidoney (1033)
• Jamaica
15 Apr 07
I like movies and books with a realistic ending I guess that was the aim of the author
@Shaun72 (15959)
• Palatka, Florida
4 Apr 07
This was a good book. I read it last year for a class I took when i was taking high school at home.I enjoyed reading it
@cdparazo (5765)
• Philippines
3 Apr 07
This story only goes to show that happy endings is not for everybody. One thing is sure though, it is meant to give us a lesson and it happens for a reason. The story is really sad but it is also a reflection of the realities of life.
@liranlgo (5752)
• Israel
3 Apr 07
so it would not have been a tragic story.. how do you think it should end? would you be satisfied if everything will have a good ending? i think the book has a purpose for the reader maybe if there would be a happy ending it would ruin what the writer meant to say by this certain ending. don't you think?