do you think daniel radcliffe suits the character of a 6th year school boy????
By harsha_kak
@harsha_kak (241)
India
April 3, 2007 12:50pm CST
i think he looks more aged by the time. so i think somebody should replace him. whatz ur opinion??????
4 responses
@vijay4056 (159)
• India
3 Apr 07
He wont suit well
he s already getting old which is a very big prob
@evelynlyp (788)
• Japan
4 Apr 07
In Harry potter books, 6th yrs are 16 yrs old. Daniel is 17, that's not very much of a difference.
@GnosticGoddess (5626)
• United States
6 Apr 07
First of all they've already signed up for the all the films. If they did or had replaced him it would have been a MAJOR mistake. Radcliffe is only a year or maybe closer to two years older than the character he's playing so he is NOT too old nor does he look too old to play the character.
Do you watch the movies? Or read the books? Because the 6th year of Hogwarts is different than 6th grade. It's more like the 11th grade or a junior in high school.
@evelynlyp (788)
• Japan
3 Apr 07
I never thought he suited the role of Harry Potter to begin with. I still wish he gets replaced. I don't think they got a suitable actor to be dumbledore yet. The old dumbledore was too soft, the new one is too aggressive.
Snape, McGonagall and Hermione is perfect though.
