Should big star do more for charity than ordinary people?

April 8, 2007 4:28am CST
I watched Jackie chan and his actions for charity on TV few days ago.He does not only concern about poor but also landmine in Cambodia and AIDS in Vietnam,he went to Cambodia mine field twice as a good -will ambassador of United Nations,also he viewed children of Vietnam,and he shoot advertisement for safety voluntarily. i want to know how you think about charity,should big star do more for charity than us?
1 person likes this
3 responses
• United States
9 Apr 07
I think the people that have the ability to do more should do more. I don't have money to give to charity so I give all my old clothes and shoes that we don't use anymore. But celebs with money should at least donate some of their money if not their time.
• China
11 Apr 07
You are right,man,but the problem is there are so many people who have extra money that can help others but they donnot,maybe they donnot have this idea,maybe another reason,I donnot know.What I want to know is how to make these persons help the poors,and if we have no money,no other things to help,then what we can do for them?Nothing?
@desi8989 (120)
2 Dec 11
they are people who earn lots of money well and good that help giving your money for something better but there are others who would not nothing to me whether they are nasty people and we should be equal.
• United States
11 Jul 08
I don't think it is so much that they 'should' do more for charity than ordinary folks, per se, but that their monetary ability is usually more than the average person. I believe that the more you have, the more you should share/give/help. ~~