Have you read the Apocryphus Gospels?

@missak (3311)
Spain
April 13, 2007 12:24am CST
Do you like them? believe in them? hate them? take them for sin?
2 people like this
4 responses
@ESKARENA1 (18260)
13 Apr 07
i think they are simply the elements of the bible that the established church didnt like and banned because they contradicted authordoxy blessed be
2 people like this
@missak (3311)
• Spain
13 Apr 07
Thanks for the answer. Have you read some? I don't find the same, they seem to have a different way of expression... or that doesn't mind?
2 people like this
@ESKARENA1 (18260)
9 May 07
i read some of it when i was a student and they certainly do not fit comfortably with the rest of the bible blessed be
1 person likes this
@ESKARENA1 (18260)
9 May 07
by the way, thank you for the best response always appreciated blessed be
1 person likes this
• United States
13 Apr 07
yes i have read them and think they should be included with the rest !
2 people like this
10 May 07
I agree with 'rev' and feel that if they are included, everyone can make an opinion for themselves. When reading the Gnostic Gospels, as those parts of the Apocrypha written at the time of Jesus are known, it should be born in mind that they do not all reflect the given belief that there is only 1 God (I believe in one texts Jesus is said to refer to the Gods as 'the Forefathers', and is definitely plural), but most important is the ideology known to all Christians as 'we are all Gods children', as this refers to the Sumerian religious aspect of Nephilim worship. The Sumerians believed that many Nephilim came to Earth and used humans as workers. After some time, certain members of the Nephilim felt this enslavery was unjust, and a war broke out. Mankind was recreated but using a female Nephilim to bear the human children, As such, these humans were half man, half Nephilim, and therefore contained a piece of the Divine within them. This was passed down, just as families share DNA, and that ecery humanbeing (male and female) contaons this hidden knowledge and connection to God. As the church has always maintained that it is the only knowledge of God, and that you can only find God and enter Heaven through its churches and monks, priests etc, this idea of not needing priests nor churches, but instead self-examination, and your own body being a temple to God, was seen as very dangerous to the church. Strangely, in the Middle Ages, when the RC Church started producing new religious books, such as the 'Malleus Maleficarum', they wrote a hierarchy of angels, with Archangels at the peak. This list included the Christmas associated Chrubim and Seruphim (the Seruphim were angels of vengreance!), and also the Nephilim. Despite the church denying the truth of the Apocrypha, they used them as the basis for these old texts.
1 person likes this
@missak (3311)
• Spain
13 Apr 07
I have read a little, I got to go deeper. Th Church complains they even use a different language that is not related to the accepted Gospels, did you feel like this?
1 person likes this
@missak (3311)
• Spain
13 Apr 07
By the way, I've heard there were more than 600 books... which ones did you read? I have read the "Gospel of mary" (three pages) and I love it, but I have read some of the "Gospel of Philip" and I don't agree or don't understand what he talks about. Also I have read a little of the "Egyptians Gospel" and it looks different, like a story for childrens... I'll tell you more when I finish it.
1 person likes this
• Janesville, Wisconsin
27 Apr 07
I have not read them, thanks for asking and sharing about them, Now I got another thing to hunt down to read :) - DNatureofDTrain
@aweins (4198)
• India
10 May 07
HI Missak, i donno what does this word "Apocryphus Gospels" means. so what can i say. i havent ever read about this anywhere nor have i ever heard about it.
1 person likes this