The Asteroid Belt...what's it's purpose?

WR Curtis Jr
United States
October 19, 2006 7:37pm CST
I am curious as to what you think the Asteroid Belt really is or was. One of my thoughts is that two planets rotated around one another at equal speeds and equal in size. Due to interference from a comet or other asteroids they slid just enough out of orbit of one another and, as destiny would have it, clashed into each other in a cataclismic event that would hurtle a quarter of one planet into Mars and other large junks at Earth, Venus, and Jupiter.
2 responses
• India
7 Nov 06
Got all this from wikipedia...... The asteroid belt is a region of the solar system falling roughly between the planets Mars and Jupiter where the greatest concentration of asteroid orbits can be found. It is termed the main belt when contrasted with other concentrations of minor planets, since these may also be termed asteroid belts. In this usage, it often refers only to the greatest concentration of bodies with semi-major axes between the 4:1 and 2:1 Kirkwood gaps at 2.06 and 3.27 AU, with eccentricities less than about 0.33, and with inclinations below about 20°. This region is marked in red in the diagrams below, and contains approximately 93.4% of all numbered minor planets. The asteroid belt region of space also contains some main-belt comets which may have been the source of Earth's water. Am presently unable to put a pic up....and need to add another post up.... cheers.
• United States
6 Jul 07
You deserve the mark for best. I am closing out my old discussions been away for awhile.
• United States
6 Jul 07
By the way, if you think that it was possible that two planets of similar size slammed into each other throwing off much rock you might see the possibility of not much in the asteroid belt. (Remember Mars, and the size of the Mariana Trench? Anyhow.
• India
7 Nov 06
You will like this.......... An old hypothesis that is much less favored these days was that the asteroids in the asteroid belt are the remnants of a destroyed planet called Phaeton. A key problem with such an hypothesis is the staggering amount of energy required to achieve this kind of effect, and also the fact that the combined mass of the asteroid belt amounts to less than the mass of Earths moon
1 person likes this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
2 Nov 06
The general concensus of opinion is that the asteroid belt is simply the remains of a previous planetoid mass that broke up either due to instability or from the impact of another body, but of course you already knew that. I have no reason to doubt the theory as it is perfectly logical and I cannot see any realistic alternative explanation.
• United States
2 Nov 06
Thank you for your input. Yes I am aware of what the general consensus is, but I have much reason to doubt. We have more to learn about this vast Universe and its awesome power that caused us to be what we are. I am a writer so I always question. Philosophy is a beautiful thing. Astronomy, archaeology, geology, biology (especially in the micro since) amaze me. And that we've been able to witness such things in our life time is why I started one of these many discussions. I am glad someone finally noticed it. Again thank you for your words of human theory. But one thing I will say, is I always keep an open mind.
• United States
4 Nov 06
Always interesting to know not many people are interested in space...lol