Serial Killers, Do we study them or Kill them?
By Macthedj
@Macthedj (630)
August 3, 2007 8:48pm CST
Me and my friend had a discussion about what should happen to killers. I explained that I think if they are diagnosed to be psychotic in anyway then we should not have them killed but take the oppertunity to study thier minds, to find what makes them tick, what made them kill and what makes them want to continue to kill. EG Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, Their minds have been studied so much in the past that Serial Killer profilers have been able to help catch various other killers in a far quicker time than in the past. What do you think? KILL THEM or STUDY THEM
3 responses
@bluishrose (2289)
• Philippines
4 Aug 07
We should study them first to understand reasons why they are liked that, it also helps in solving and capturing other killers because in a way they are connected and related. Then after that they should be killed! hehehe
@brendakaya (2332)
• United States
4 Aug 07
I don't think we should waste alot of money, studying them for long periods of time. We should study them for a short while, and find out about them to some degree, but I don't see any point in keeping them alive for years, and paying to feed them, and give them alot of attention. They need to pay for their crimes, and I wouldn't want them to be given any opportunity to escape.
@fn187zbabe (174)
• United States
4 Aug 07
I think your right. Killing them does no one any good but if they are to stay alive I don't believe they should ever have an opportunity to be free again and they should be made to work like everyone else so us taxpayers don't have to flip the bill.
