Counter-Strike Source vs. Counter-Strike 1.6
September 3, 2007 4:11pm CST
Hi peoples. Have you ever played Counter-Strike:Source? If you don't, I recommend it to you. If you have already played, congratilation, I want to know your opinion about this version, in analogy with Counter-Strike 1.6. I think it's much better, the physic, the graphic, the game per total, it's nice. I play it almost everyday from 2 years ago and I didn't get bored of it, I still like it. What do you think? Who is the best? Counter-Srike 1.6 or Counter-Strike: Source? I choose Source for now:P
13 Sep 07
well, both has its merits and de-merits. like you said, CS Source has a better graphic, physic. And I like the way things fly when a hand-grenade exploded, the environment of de-dust 2, the fire burning after the c4 explosion. But not all computers(in Malaysia especially) can really run this game smoothly at high settings. I like Source. Im totally in love with it. On the other hand, any computer now could run 1.6 on a high settings smoothly. Plus, Counter Strike 1.6 is always a great game even though it's old. But without the physic, and the graphic are outdated. Still, both are a great game and I hope both games would last forever. Im currently playing CS Source now.
5 Aug 08
Ive started counterstrike after i used to play it about 5 years ago going back i gotta say... its bloody hard to get back into the nick of things, endless headshots makeing the game appear its for the counterstrike veterans who own noobs like myself, im not looking for an easy game either, im keeping on with 1.6 but is there really any diffrence in source other than graphics??? (i remeberd when i first tried source ages ago and i took a real dislike to it, maybe now because ive lost my touch im beging to reconsider it again.)