To what extent Casino Royal satisfied the Audience.
By nthondepu
@nthondepu (55)
India
September 30, 2007 12:53am CST
James bond movies grabs good stories, they shows the cutting edge technology in his gadgets. Casino Royal also is also a James bond movie.Compared to the movies of "Tomorrow Never Dies","The world is not enough",to what extent the "Casino Royal" satisfied the audience.
1 person likes this
7 responses
@cobradene (1171)
• India
29 Oct 07
I was disappointed with the movie after all the media hype. I missed the gadgets usually Bond used in his earlier movies, but that maybe a childish reason on my part. But even otherwise, there wasn't much at all. The story lacked suspense, and also, it was so predictable. But, over all the art work didn't meet graph of the media hype that was created. I would say, the bond movies of the past were much better. I didn't like Casino Royale. It was all about playing cards which he won. So what's great about it? A hero will always win and who doesn't know. So, I was just sitting and waiting to see when will he win.
2 people like this
@lucgeta (924)
• France
8 Dec 07
The gadgets were making Bond movies look like comedy rather than a thriller. This time we had some tech stuff like the remote medical support.
It was time to get real - no more vilains taking the world with gigantic weapons or whatever.
@nthondepu (55)
• India
31 Oct 07
may be the producers bring the next movie with rich contents(fights,suspense,action,gadgets bla bla bla).
@varunkrishna007 (1909)
• India
30 Sep 07
hmm for me it just disappointed, infact the guy who was bond lacked the vigour that PIERCE BROSNAN had .may be i feel so because am a diehard fan of him,but stil for me it was a disaster
@nthondepu (55)
• India
6 Oct 07
It also disappointed me and my friends also.As the movie came after several days I thought there will be powerful story but it went wrong
1 person likes this
@indusnawani87 (109)
• India
12 Oct 07
i admit that i heavily doubted & critcised the new bond before release of the film because brosnan was very cool..
but movie turned out to be more realistic with daniel perfectly suiting the role...now i must say he was a better choice than brosnan.
2 people like this
@monicazhang (802)
• China
30 Sep 07
I thought its a good one.I saw it with my boyfriend at the begining of the year.So I didnt quite remember the stories of the film.I have to admit that I doubt the new acotr of James bond at first,but gradually I found he is stronger and more real and masculine than the previous one.
1 person likes this
@nthondepu (55)
• India
6 Oct 07
yes you are right monicazhang.He looks more good than Pierce Brosnan.
@killersss (638)
• India
17 Sep 09
i think, it was a good movie, not so good, but the best part i liked about the movie was poker, i really like poker and i play poker for real as well, so i really like that poker in it. except that i don't think anything was there in the movie to get to my attention. it did satisfy me.
@lucgeta (924)
• France
8 Dec 07
One of the greatest Bond movies of all times. Daniel Craig did a extraordinary job bringing the rough tug part of the character back to the screen - it was always there in the books. Have you never wondered why Bond kills so many people in the other movies? He could have arrested them as a police officer, couldn't?
And the story is pure suspense. Not like waiting to see him win - at least it was not missing five seconds to total destruction lol - but all the espionage in that table and the hotel.
Very real, very emotive, very intelligent, very touching.
