Is love totally free from lust???

lustre - lust n love
@Rakhi6c (299)
India
November 20, 2007 8:40am CST
I dont agree with that ..lust is nothing but the physical part of love..what your opinion on this??
5 responses
@riyasam (16556)
• India
20 Nov 07
i would think where there is love,there is bound to be lust.
1 person likes this
@Rakhi6c (299)
• India
20 Nov 07
yeah i agree with you but not completely..there is some lust in every love..thats what i feel..thanks for reply..
20 Nov 07
I agree with you to a certain point... But in marraiges, doesn't the "lust" burn out a bit after a while? Yet people still love each other? it's the difference between loving and being in love with. i think that lust will usually go eventually... love may always stay!
@Rakhi6c (299)
• India
20 Nov 07
I agree with you that lust eventually go..but later there is dependency on one another..And love crosses all those..But initially its lust thats helps develop that love to that tall..anyway thanks for your opinion..
@shak143 (1280)
• India
12 Dec 07
love is different from lust.its not a physical part of love completely.lust is a feeling and is more than that.
@lionmuri (68)
• Indonesia
20 Nov 07
love is lust,without lust means having live without soul you have to love and lust it without it having love is nothing,it is like having faith but never chosed to pray
@Rakhi6c (299)
• India
21 Nov 07
I partially disagree with you ..because love is something great and lust is a part of it..i dont agree with your phrase love is lust..anyway i appreciate your response..
@jongsky (31)
• Philippines
21 Nov 07
Its relative. But for me Love is free from lust. If we love somebody and we make love, that is because of love. But if we make love for the sake of doing it and no sense of obligation, then that is lust. If we truly love somebody, then the relationship stays forever even lovemaking is gone. But if we do it out of lust, then the relationship will just be temporary. It will be gone when lust is gone.