Spamming... Not OK on the Net... But OK on the phone?

Australia
November 20, 2007 9:38pm CST
I have thought of this for many years... and still don't understand it. Almost as soon as people went on the Internet back in the 90's... the word "spamming" was invented to describe "sending unsolicited emails". But since then... the business of making unsolicited telephone calls to sell something and anything has flourished. No one has made it illegal and no-one did bother to invent a name for it. Why? I am raising this question... because our very own Australian Prime Minister... who has put all sort of laws in place against spamming... is resorting to calling people through an automatic internet exchange in order to convince people to vote for him next Saturday. ________________________________________________ The Government is also hitting the phones. Short recorded messages from the Prime Minister, Treasurer, ministers, and retiring MPs, are being sent by computer to the home phones of voters in more than 20 marginal seats across the country. The Liberal Party says they won't go to mobile phones or people on the Do Not Call list. The blitz started yesterday afternoon. "We've found that they're a welcome and effective form of communication," he said. "It's not invasive. They're quite short. They are positive, they're about our plans for growth and low inflation and jobs, and people want to know about that. And in our view, it works very effectively." __________________________ What do you think? Should we call this practice "Spamming"?
2 people like this
4 responses
@hhhxxccc (222)
• United States
21 Nov 07
i CANNOT stand telemarketers for whatever reason. And the worst part is i get at least 4 everday lol. Augh, it is so annoying.
1 person likes this
• Malaysia
21 Nov 07
I would consider it as 'spamming'. To me this is worst than internet spamming n could be irritating as well. The govt must be so desperade for votes.
1 person likes this
@friendship (2084)
• Canada
1 Dec 07
I think spamming is not OK on the Net because today, most businesses use emails and Internet to do business transactions. So, it will disrupt business activities if people are allowed to "send unsolicited emails". Can you imagine how we have to sort it out? -- which emails are worthy and which one is merely unsolicited emails? How much time will be wasted to sort it out? With regard to spmaming through the phone, it may also give a bad effect but it is not as bad as spamming through email. If someone receives a "spamming" phone, he will be able to hang up. If he doesn't like getting it, he can choose Do Not Call list. The story you mentioned above, I think that the government can ask whether its citizens want to be informed or not regarding important news from them. People can choose it.
@gmchun83 (48)
• Malaysia
19 Feb 08
It consider as spamming.More worst than internet spamming.